Hydrostatic paradox one step further- weights of the different fluid amounts

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the weight relationship between two containers filled with water, where one has a lower diameter twice that of its upper diameter. Initial calculations suggested that the right container holds 3/4 the volume of the left, leading to an incorrect weight ratio of 4/3. Further analysis revealed that the left container's weight is actually 8/5 that of the right container, correcting earlier assumptions about the geometry of the containers. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately calculating volumes and understanding the implications of three-dimensional shapes in hydrostatic problems. Ultimately, the correct weight relationship is established as W_left = 8/5 W_right.
symphwar
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two open-top containers, #1 on the left
and #2 on the right, with equal base area A
are placed on two scales. The #2 container
on the right has an lower diameter twice that
of its upper diameter and the height of its
lower (larger) diameter is half that of its water
height. Both containers are filled with water
to the same height H, as shown below.

http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/3197/pascalvases.th.png

(http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/89/pascalvases.png/)What is the relationship between the weights
exerted by the flasks on the scales supporting
the containers?

1. Wleft = 8/5 Wright
2. Wleft = 6/5 Wright
3. Wleft = 5/3 Wright
4. Wleft = 7/4 Wright
5. cannot be determined
6. Wleft = 3/2 Wright
7. Wleft = Wright
8. Wleft = 2 Wright
9. Wleft = 7/5 Wright
10. Wleft = 4/3 Wright

Homework Equations



W = mg
m = V\rho
P = Patm + \rhogh

The Attempt at a Solution



My first try with this problem was to use the given dimensions of the container to determine that the flask on the right contains 3/4 as much water as the one on the left. However, 4/3 Wr was not correct. Looking at the differences between the flasks, I surmise that the flask on the right has the gravitational force from the mass of water, as well as downward forces from the horizontal "sides" of the container. These, added together, must equal the force from the bottom of the flask (upwards). This force from the bottom is equal to the pressure from the water on the bottom, and is, in classic hydrostatic paradox fashion, equivalent for both containers- F = 2A\rhogh. The weight of the left beaker, I think, would just be this force on the bottom. The sides of the right container are the additional factor I can't seem to weave in. I guessed that the normal-type force downwards from the flask "sides" would be F = PA = 1/4 A\rhogh per side, being h below the surface of the entire column of water and acting over 1/2 d of the bottom per side. But subtracting this, doubled, from the force acting on the bottom, just gives me the incorrect 4/3 ratio of weights again. What am I doing wrong? Thanks in advance for any input and sagely wisdom!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
symphwar said:

The Attempt at a Solution



My first try with this problem was to use the given dimensions of the container to determine that the flask on the right contains 3/4 as much water as the one on the left.

Why 3/4? Remember, a flask exist is three-dimension, it is not a two-dimensional figure on a sheet of paper or on the display of a computer. Determine the volumes in terms of d and h. What do you get?

ehild
 
Well, knowing that the bottom area is the same for both, the volume contained in the left beaker would be A2h. Whereas, for the right flask, that would be...Ah + 1/2 Ah = 3/2 Ah. W,l = 2Ah vs. W,r = 3/2 Ah, so W,l / W,r = 4/3 again? I could be making a mistake assuming that the top, skinny part of the right container has a cross-sectional area of 1/2 A?
 
Last edited:
The diameter is half, what is the area?

ehild
 
D'oh. Lesson learned- never assume things are cubical (/forget what 'diameter' implies). Thanks so much! Obviously (argh), Wl = 8/5 Wr.
 
Welcome in 3D world.:biggrin:

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top