The path described by a constantly accelerating particle is given by:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[itex]x=c\sqrt{c^2/a'^2+t^2}[/itex]

where a prime denotes an observer traveling with the particle and a letter without a prime a resting observer.

If we leave the [itex]c^2/a'^2[/itex] out it reduces to x=ct, which makes sense. The distance traveled by a photon is simply it's speed times the travel time. If we think of a constantly accelerating particle, a particle which would first need to accelerate to a speed c (or at least close to it), we would expect that it would travel a shorter distance in the same amount of time, since it would first need to accelerate and hence travel at a smaller average speed. However, when you look at the equation above, you can see the travel time gets a little bonus, [itex]c^2/a'^2[/itex]:

[itex]x=c\left[t+f\left(c^2/a'^2\right)\right][/itex]

According to the equation, the slower one accelerates, the larger distance one will be able to travel. To me that does not make any sense at all, so I wondered whether I made any mistakes and decided to verify the answer on the internet. However, without blinking an eye, every single source I find online gives me the same answer.

So where do I go wrong in all this?

Sources:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbolic_motion_(relativity [Broken])

http://www.physik.uni-leipzig.de/~schiller/ed10/Uniform relativistic acceleration.pdf

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Hyperbolic path in Minkowski space

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**