I am having some trouble with conservation of energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a homework problem involving the conservation of energy, specifically the equation K1 + U1 + Wnc = K2 + U2. The user attempts to solve for kinetic energy while considering the effects of kinetic friction and spring compression. Key points of confusion arise from the incorrect assumption that the work done by friction is positive and the neglect of the object's speed at the spring's uncompressed state. The correct approach requires recognizing that the work done by friction is negative and that the object's speed is zero when the spring is fully compressed and returns to its uncompressed length. This understanding is essential to eliminate the variable 'x' from the equation.
kyin01
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


2-5.png



Homework Equations


K_{1}+U_{1}+W_{nc}=K_{2}+U_{2}


The Attempt at a Solution


Using the above equation

1/2mv^{2} + 0 + xmg\mu = 0 + 1/2kx^{2}

On the left side
When it hits the spring there is 0 potential because it has not yet compress the spring and it still remains on a horizontal surface. It has a kinetic energy and kinetic friction work
On the right side
I have 0 kinetic because it just finished compressing the spring and about to decompress so instead I get maximum potential energy.

So solving for K i get

\frac{mv^{2}+xmg\mu}{x^{2}}

But according to the answer it does not depend on the variable X (distance compressed by spring)
So I'm not entirely sure I know where I made my mistake
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Aside from your algebra error and your incorrect assumption that the work done by friction is positive, you have neglected to incorporate the given condition that the object has no speed when the spring returns to its uncompressed length (that is, its speed is zero both when the spring is fully compressed, and when it returns to its uncompressed state). That will give you the info you need to eliminate the 'x' term. Remember that the work done by friction is negative.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top