I feel like a dunce. I can't find the error

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrspeedybob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Error
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a video demonstrating a flawed algebraic proof that claims 4 equals 5. The error occurs when the equation A(B-C-A) = B(B-C-A) is divided by B-C-A, which equals zero. This division is invalid, as dividing by zero is not permissible in mathematics. Participants clarify that the key takeaway is understanding that equations are only valid when the divisor is not zero. The conversation emphasizes the importance of recognizing such mathematical pitfalls.
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In line 7, B - C - A = 0. The equation A*0 = B*0 does not imply that A = B.
 
The use of A, B and C is to obfuscate what is going on. If you substitute in the values, it is obvious.

Line 7:
A(B-C-A) = B (B-C-A)
He then divided by B-C-A.

But B-C-A = 0, and so Line 7 is nothing more than
4 \times 0 = 5 \times 0
 
I see.
So the lesson learned here is that when deviding both sides of an equation by anything the resulting equation is only valid where that thing ≠0
Thanks.
 
mrspeedybob said:
I see.
So the lesson learned here is that when deviding both sides of an equation by anything the resulting equation is only valid where that thing ≠0
Thanks.
A shorter way of saying that is that you can't divide both sides of an equation by zero.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top