I=mv^2/w^2-2mgh/w^2Find Inertia of Wheel for Block & Pulley Homework

  • Thread starter Thread starter eagles12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Pulley
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia of a wheel in a block and pulley system, given specific parameters such as mass, radius, and height. The user derived the equation h=(v^2/2g)(1+I/mR^2) and calculated the moment of inertia as I=0.2349, but faced issues with significant digits in the final answer. Participants advised using more precise values for gravitational acceleration, suggesting 9.807 m/s² or even 9.80665 m/s² for better accuracy. They emphasized the importance of rounding only the final result to maintain calculation precision. The conversation highlights the significance of using accurate constants and proper rounding techniques in physics calculations.
eagles12
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A block of mass m=2.4kg is attached to a string that is wrapped around the circumference of a wheel of radius r=7.6cm. The wheel rotates freely about it's axis and the string wraps around it's circumfrence without slipping. Initially, the wheel rotates with an angular speed ω, causing the block to rise with a linear speed v=.29m/s.
Find the moment of inertia of the wheel if the block rises to a height of h=7.7cm before momentarily coming to rest.

Homework Equations



Ei=Ef

The Attempt at a Solution



Ei=1/2mv^2+1/2Iw^2+mgy
Ei=1/2mv^2+1/2Iw^2+0
Ef=1/2mv^2+1/2Iw^2+mgy
Ef=0+0+mgh
mgh=1/2mv^2+1/2Iw^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I had found the equation
h=(v^2/2g)(1+I/mR^2)
and i got I=.2349
I had to use two significant digits in my answer and I used .23 but it is saying that I need to check the rounding or number of significant digits.
 
eagles12 said:
I had found the equation
h=(v^2/2g)(1+I/mR^2)
and i got I=.2349
I had to use two significant digits in my answer and I used .23 but it is saying that I need to check the rounding or number of significant digits.

What value did you use for g? You should use values for constants that have more digits of accuracy than the result requires.
 
I used 9.8 would 9.81 be better? or should I go further than that?
 
got it! thanks!
 
eagles12 said:
I used 9.8 would 9.81 be better? or should I go further than that?

g = 9.807 m/s2 is usually good enough. I usually use g = 9.80665 m/s2 in my calculations so I never have to worry about it :smile:

Round results, not intermediate values, so you don't lose accuracy through the calculation process.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top