Why Choose an I Section Over a Square Section for Load-Bearing Applications?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Analysis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Section Square
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the technical advantages of using I sections over square sections in load-bearing applications, emphasizing that I beams are lighter and more efficient for bending loads due to their design. While square sections may provide a higher area moment of inertia, resulting in lower bending stress, I beams are preferred for their reduced volume and weight, which do not compromise strength under bending moments. Additionally, I sections are easier to galvanize and maintain due to their lower surface area. However, considerations such as manufacturing limitations and transverse loading conditions can influence the choice of section. Ultimately, I beams are recommended for applications where bending moments are critical.
Analysis
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Dear all

Apart from cost saving (or reduction in material)what is the technical advantage using I section instead of square section?

My application is,section is going to be simply supported to the static load.myself awared that I section is good for bending loads.Instead i am using square section,so my area moment of inertia will be high,the bending stress would be low.

Kindly comment the above subject.

Thanks
Prakash
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I use square sections when I want a cleaner or more attractive design, or when I have a bending component in the other plan. Less surface area collects less dust and is easier to wash down. When galvanizing less surface area uses less and is easier to ensure a uniform coating.
 
The most important reason to use an "I beam" (or "I section") is that it has much less volume and so much less weight than a square section of the same dimensions. And, since such things as "bending moment" depend upon the length in varying directions rather than volume, you don't lose strength.
 
I beam definitely is an obvious choice for situations where bending moment is of prime concern. As long as following conditions are not true, you can always go for I-beam:

1: Manufacturing: Normally i beams are not available in smaller section and hard to join (welding etc)

2: I beam is a poor choice where you have loads acting transversely to the length of beam.
 
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
I need some assistance with calculating hp requirements for moving a load. - The 4000lb load is resting on ball bearing rails so friction is effectively zero and will be covered by my added power contingencies. Load: 4000lbs Distance to travel: 10 meters. Time to Travel: 7.5 seconds Need to accelerate the load from a stop to a nominal speed then decelerate coming to a stop. My power delivery method will be a gearmotor driving a gear rack. - I suspect the pinion gear to be about 3-4in in...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
14K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
13K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
23K
Replies
15
Views
53K
Back
Top