I solved a problem but I need some insight into why it was solved this way.

  • Thread starter Thread starter G01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Insight
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a homework problem involving a 1kg block on a 5kg block oscillating on a spring, where the small block begins to slip at a certain amplitude. The user initially believed only the mass of the small block should be used to calculate the coefficient of static friction, but learns that the total mass of the system must be considered because both blocks oscillate together. The correct approach involves equating the maximum static friction force to the acceleration of the entire system, leading to the correct calculation of the coefficient. The conversation clarifies the reasoning behind using the total mass and emphasizes the importance of understanding the forces at play. Ultimately, the user gains insight into the problem-solving process and corrects their reasoning.
G01
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,704
Reaction score
19
Hi. I just solved a homework problem. I eventually got the right answer and am only confused about why it was solved that way. This is the reason I posted it here instead of in the homework help section. All I need is a little insight into why the solution is the way it is. OK here we go:

A 1kg block sits atop a 5kg block as it osscilates on a spring. The period is 1.5s. The small block begins to slip when the Amplitude is increased to .4m What is the coefficient of satic friction bewteen the two blocks.

The solution is simple:

F_{sp} = f_s

-kA = \mu_smg

\mu_s = \frac{-kA}{mg}

Using the period you can solve for k = 105.3 N/m. The you can solve for \mu_s

Now here's my problem. In order to get the right answer you must use m= the total mass of the system= 6kg. I thought that since only the small block was sliding, only its mass shouldbe used in this calculation. Why is the total mass used? That is my question. Thank you for your help. (If this should still be in the homework help section, please move it.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Im bumping the thread.
 
G01 said:
The solution is simple:

F_{sp} = f_s

-kA = \mu_smg

\mu_s = \frac{-kA}{mg}

Using the period you can solve for k = 105.3 N/m. The you can solve for \mu_s
While your answer happens to be correct, the solution is not. You seem to be assuming that the force of the spring equals the static friction force. Why would that be?

The way to solve it is this: The only force on the small mass is the static friction. What's the maximum possible static friction? Thus what's the maximum allowable acceleration of that small mass before it begins to slide? Set that equal to the acceleration of the whole thing when the spring force is at its maximum.

Now here's my problem. In order to get the right answer you must use m= the total mass of the system= 6kg. I thought that since only the small block was sliding, only its mass shouldbe used in this calculation. Why is the total mass used?
See my comments above. Note that you are solving for the coefficient that will allow both masses to move together without slipping. The entire thing oscillates.
 
Ahh i see. so what your saying is this. The maximum acceleration from friction is

\mu_sg = a

now I set that equal to the acceleration of the whole system which would be:

\frac{-kA}{m_{system}} = a = \mu_sg

\frac{-kA}{m_{system}g} = \mu_s

Now that would give me the right answer, and now my reasoning is correct I hope. I understand this much better now I think. Thanks alot.
 
You got it. But watch out for that minus sign, lest someone roll their eyes at you like this: :rolleyes:

:smile:
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top