I think i did this electric potential problem correctly but

AI Thread Summary
A helium nucleus with a charge of +2e and mass of 6.63E-27 kg enters an electric field, moving from a potential of 1.5E3 V to 4.0E3 V. The attempt to calculate the speed at point B using the equation delta V = - (delta KE)/q led to an incorrect final speed of 7.91E5 m/s, while the expected answer is 3.78E5 m/s. The mistake identified is a sign error, as the nucleus moves from a lower to a higher potential, indicating it should slow down rather than speed up. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly interpreting the direction of electric fields and potential differences in such problems. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately solving electric potential problems.
punktux
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a helium nucleus (charge =2e, mass = 6.63E-27 kg) traveling at a speed of 6.20E5 m/s enters an electric field, traveling from point A, at a potential of 1.5E3 V, to point B, at 4.0E3 V. what is the speed at point B?

Homework Equations



charge = 2e = 2 * 1.6E-19 C
delta V is potential difference.
i used equation delta V = - (delta KE)/q and derived the relationship:
delta V = - mass/2q (vf^2 - vi^2)

The Attempt at a Solution


since the charge is 2e and e for electron is -1.6E-19 C, so the right hand side is positive. the left side is 4.0E3-1.5E3...finally i solved vf and got 7.91E5 m/s but the answer is 3.78E5 m/s

i don't get it...where is the mistake?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are making a sign error. Electric fields point from higher potential to lower potential. The helium nucleus is +2e (not a negative charge). This positive charge is going from A to B, or lower potential to higher potential. This means it is going against the E field. This means that the nucleus will slow down, not speed up. Notice that the answer you want is smaller than the initial velocity.

Note: I haven't done the math to check your equations. I'm just looking at what the answer, in general, should look like.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top