I with my design engineering homewrk

  • Thread starter Thread starter vondutchgurl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Design Engineering
AI Thread Summary
The assignment involves determining the maximum weight a boat made from a single sheet of cardboard (4 feet by 8 feet) can float, with the option to fold, cut, and glue it into any shape. Calculating the volume of a 2' by 2' by 4' structure yields 32 cubic feet, leading to a weight calculation of 1996.8 pounds using the water's weight per cubic foot. However, this weight seems unrealistic for a cardboard boat. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding Archimedes' principle, which states that the weight of the water displaced equals the weight of the boat. Accurate design will require careful consideration of volume displacement to avoid sinking.
vondutchgurl
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
i was given an assignment in my design engineering class...it goes as follows:

What is the maximum amount of weight that can float in a boat made out of 1 sheet of cardboard 4 feet by 8 feet in size...when flat but it can be folded and cut and glued in any shape you choose.
**you also have to be able to prove your solution**

If the dimensions were 2' by 2' by 4' then the volume would be 32
and then next would i have to times 32 by 62.4 ( weight of water per cubis foot) to give me the answer.?

cuz it would come out too be 1996.8 pounds...and it seems to me that that's a little to much for a cardboard box on water to hold

if anyone could help me with this that would be awesome
thanks
-brooke



thanks--- :biggrin:
brooke
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This isn't exactly my field, but it might help to know what those dimensions are. I would assume it would support the maximum weight if it displaced the maximum volume for the given area, which makes it a relatively simple extreme-value problem.
 
you need to remember archamedias in this problem because the weifgt of the water displaced is also the weight of the water inside so you can't fill it to the top cause if you do then it would sink
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top