Ideal Gas Law - spacing between particles of the gas

sjt420
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



One mole of an ideal gas is a temperature 300K adn at 1.00 atm pressure. a) find the volume. b) Estimate the average spacing between the particles of the gas.

Homework Equations


For the first part I used PV=nRT and solved for V to determine the volume which I found to be 2.46 x 10 ^-2 cubic meters.



The Attempt at a Solution

I have no idea where to start for the average spacing between the particles. Any tips or ideas would be great! Thank you.

I went on working some more problems and found one mentioning density. Is that what this is asking for? If so, I still need some help identifying a formula or something for the density. thanks again.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Imagine the particles placed on the corners of a cubes, neatly packed all over space:
if the distance between 2 closest neighbors is d, how may particles per volume would you have?

In your case, you know how many particles [I hope you know what a "mole" is] per volume, so you can infer d this way.
 
Or if you want to imagine the particles in some other nice symmetric configuration, that's fine too. You just need an estimate of the spacing.

Even a simple dimensional argument will give a correct answer.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top