Identical particles and degenrate energy levels

Sunshine
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Five electrons (with mass m) whose interaction can be neglected, are in the same 3-dim harmonic oscillatorpotential
V(x,y,z) = \frac k2 (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)

What is the ground state energy?

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I have the energy for the potential. It is:
E_{n_x,n_y,n_z} = (n_x+n_y+n_z + \frac 32)\frac{\hbar\omega}2

My question is about the degeneracy.Since it's electrons, at most 2 of them can be in the same state, but can more than 2 electrons have the same energy?

Relating to this question: Should the ground state energy for this system be

E=2E_{111}+2E_{211}+E_{121}

or are the two states (211) and (121) not allowed to have more than 2 electrons totally, ie

E=2E_{111}+2E_{211}+E_{221}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sunshine said:

Homework Statement


Five electrons (with mass m) whose interaction can be neglected, are in the same 3-dim harmonic oscillatorpotential
V(x,y,z) = \frac k2 (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)

What is the ground state energy?

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I have the energy for the potential. It is:
E_{n_x,n_y,n_z} = (n_x+n_y+n_z + \frac 32)\frac{\hbar\omega}2

My question is about the degeneracy.Since it's electrons, at most 2 of them can be in the same state, but can more than 2 electrons have the same energy?
of course. As long as they don't all have the same quantum numbers.
Relating to this question: Should the ground state energy for this system be

E=2E_{111}+2E_{211}+E_{121}

or are the two states (211) and (121) not allowed to have more than 2 electrons totally, ie

E=2E_{111}+2E_{211}+E_{221}

Wait. Why aren't you starting with the n=0 states??
 
Well, first of all, the n's can be zero ...

Yes, more than two electrons can have the same energy if they are in a different state.
The states are labeled by the values of nx, ny, and nz, so the states (211) and (121) are each allowed to have two electrons, for a total maximum of four.
 
Ok, didn't know that n could be 0. So the energy should be

2E_{000}+2E_{100}+E_{010}?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top