Identifying the Potential and Eigenfunction for Lowest Energy

justanovice
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the eigenfunction in the top part of the figure.
(a) Which of the three potentials illustrated in the bottom part of the
figure could lead to such an eigenfunction? Give qualitative
arguments to justify your answer. (b) The eigenfunction shown
is not the one corresponding to the lowest allowed energy for the
potential. Sketch the form of the eigenfunction which does
correspond to the lowest allowed energy E1. (c) Indicate on
another sketch the range of energies where you would expect
discretely separated allowed energy states, and the range of
energies where you would expect the allowed energies to be
continuously distributed. (d) Sketch the form of the eigenfunction which corresponds to
the second allowed energy E2. (e) To which energy level does the eigenfunction presented
on top of the figure correspond

I've attached the figure, but It might be easier to read in this file i found on the internet (problem #5): http://www.phys.ncku.edu.tw/~ccheng/MP2011/HW2_SE.pdf

The Attempt at a Solution


I have already done part (a) by identifying the sign of ψ and (V-E). I concluded that the correct potential is the last one on the bottom. You can see my solution in the attachment.
For part (b), i think the sketch should have two peaks, one in each classically allowed region (B/C and E/F in my drawing) since this is the minimum amount of oscillations that will work.
However, this makes me think the answer to part (e) is energy level two.
Which makes part (d) confusing.
Also, I'm not sure what part (c) means by "discretely separated allowed allowed energy states" and continuously distributed allowed energies.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • untitled.JPG
    untitled.JPG
    22.5 KB · Views: 1,206
  • SAVE0166.JPG
    SAVE0166.JPG
    46.6 KB · Views: 1,132
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Hm... I follow your reasoning about the wavefunction shown being the second energy level. I'm not sure what they're getting at there but I'll see if someone else can figure it out.

As for part (c), the problem is talking about bound states and scattering states. Or alternatively, think of it like this: can you identify certain significant energies at which the behavior of the corresponding eigenfunction changes? In other words, for some particular energy EA there is a qualitative difference between a wavefunction corresponding to E < EA and a wavefunction corresponding to E > EA. What energy is that? What is another energy EB at which the same could be said?
 


thank you!, i understand part (c) now.

my final is tomorrow and i was told there would be a problem similar to this, so any insight on parts (d) and (e) would help.
 


There are two possible wave functions that have one peak in the B/C and E/F. One is odd, and one is even.
 
I think I have the same exact final as justanovice...exactly the same class...lol!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top