If all the empty space of atoms were removed, how big would this earth be?

AI Thread Summary
If all the empty space in atoms were removed, the Earth would compress to approximately 500 meters in diameter, significantly larger than a marble but smaller than a large stadium. The discussion highlights the vast difference in size when comparing atomic scale to macroscopic objects. An iron atom's radius is about 1.2 x 10^-10 meters, while its nucleus is around 4.6 x 10^-15 meters, illustrating the immense scale factor involved. The concept of black hole density is also mentioned, noting that the black hole radius of Earth would be about 1 centimeter. Overall, the estimates vary widely, but the stadium size is closer to the actual compressed size of the Earth.
sskkambad
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, first time poster.
Considering some of the things discussed here, I apologize if my question sounds simplistic.

If this Earth could be compressed so that all the empty space in atoms would disappear how big would this Earth be?
My science teacher once told me that it would be the size of a marble, and I've also heard that it would be the size of a large stadium. I realize it's not an easy thing to estimate but that seems to be quite a difference.

An example of such scales of atoms would be appreciated. (i.e. I've also been told all 6.5 people in this world could be compressed into the size of a kidney bean)

Thanks!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The stadium is closer. An iron atom has a radius of about 1.2 x 10-10 m and an iron nucleus about 4.6 x 10-15 m. So there is a factor of about 26000 in radius, which means the Earth would be about 500 m across.
 
The black hole radius of the Earth is about 1 cm.
 
Thanks for the answer! Come to think of it, I think my science teacher was referring to the black hole density, not the compressed atom density.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top