If mass is constant, will an astronaut weigh the same on Moon ?

AI Thread Summary
An astronaut's mass remains constant regardless of location, whether on Earth or the Moon, but their weight will differ due to varying gravitational forces. A weighing machine calibrated for Earth measures weight, not mass, which can lead to confusion since weight is the force exerted by gravity on an object. For example, a doctor's scale measures mass and would show the same reading on the Moon as on Earth, while a bathroom scale measures weight and would show significantly less on the Moon. The distinction between mass and weight is crucial, as mass is invariant while weight changes with gravity. Therefore, while the astronaut's mass is 70 kg everywhere, their weight will be much lower on the Moon.
justx007
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Let say a weighing machine is brought to the Moon. If an astronaut weighs 70 kg on Earth, will the machine shows 70 kg on Moon? By right it should because mass is always constant?
But I am not sure.
Just like if a man is 60 kg at the Equator, will the same weighing machine shows 60 kg if he weighs himself in London?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Irrespective of where the astronaut is, her mass is going to be the same. The weight is a measure of how much gravitational force is acting on her (because, the weighing machine actually measures the force she exerts on it due to gravity, and is calibrated to display your mass on earth, since we know F=mg). So, in empty space, the astronaut will still have the same mass. But now, since the gravitational field is very low, her weight as registered by the weighing machine will be much less.

See this website for a detailed explanation
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/mass.html
 
justx007 said:
Let say a weighing machine is brought to the Moon. If an astronaut weighs 70 kg on Earth, will the machine shows 70 kg on Moon? By right it should because mass is always constant?
But I am not sure.
Just like if a man is 60 kg at the Equator, will the same weighing machine shows 60 kg if he weighs himself in London?

The answer depends on what kind of "weighing machine" you use. Suppose you use one of those fancy scales you see in a doctor's office. This scale will register a "weight" of 60 kg in North Pole, at the top of Mount Chimborazo, or on the surface of the Moon. Suppose, on the other hand, you use a typical bathroom scale. This scale will register a bit more than 60 kg at the North Pole, a bit smaller than 60 kg at the top of Mount Chimborazo, and about 10 kg on the surface of the Moon.

The difference: A doctor's scale measures mass, while a bathroom scale measures "weight". To most people (and legally), weight is just a synonym for mass. To physical scientists, weight is a completely different beast. To them weight is either (a) the force exerted on an object by gravitational attraction, or (b) all of the forces exerted on an object except for gravity. Airplane designers and most introductory physics classes use definition (a) almost exclusively. Advanced physics classes use definition (b). Your bathroom scale: definition (b).
 
Last edited:
Mass would not change but weight would. "Weight" is the force with which gravity pulls you down on the surface or scale. I suspect part of your confusion is based on using "70 kg" as a measure of "weight". On the Earth that force is mg where m is your mass and "g" anywhere on Earth does not vary very much from 9.81 m/s2: weight is proportional to mass on the surface of the Earth so we can get away with saying "weight" is 70 kg. Since kg is not a unit of force but of mass, what that really means is that the weight is (70)(-9.81)= 686.7 Joules. If you move to a different part of the earth, neither mass nor weight changes measurably.

If you move to the moon, your mass stays the same (there is a "law" of conservation of mass) but your weight changes.
 
Mass would be equal.
Problem is how to measure it - you usually measure mass through forces and the force does change. If you compare the force of an unknown body and something with known mass, scales could show correct mass, be it on the moon or jupiter. One simple spring won't work tho.
 
Due to the constant never ending supply of "cool stuff" happening in Aerospace these days I'm creating this thread to consolidate posts every time something new comes along. Please feel free to add random information if its relevant. So to start things off here is the SpaceX Dragon launch coming up shortly, I'll be following up afterwards to see how it all goes. :smile: https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/
Back
Top