If you know anything about Solid State this should be trivial.

WolfOfTheSteps
Messages
134
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The specific heat of metals is dominated by the electronic contribution at low temperatures, and by phonons at high temperatures. At what temperature are the two contributions equal in rubidium? Note that
\gamma=2.41\frac{mJ}{mole K^2}
for rubidium. Briefly describe your thinking.

The Attempt at a Solution



Just a quick question: What the heck is gamma (\gamma)?? It looks like some mutation of specific heat with moles and the kelvin squared! The chapter I am working on never mentions this variable!

If anyone knows, I'd appreciate it.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
After a lot of creative googling, I finally found out that this seems to be called the "electronic-specific heat coefficient."

I inferred this from highly technical articles that I have no idea how to understand. Does anyone know what this coefficient is, and how I might use it?

I guess this is not trivial.
 
This is from Kittel's Intro to Solid State Physics:

At temperatures much below both the Debye temperature \theta and the fermi temperature T_F, the heat capacity of metals may be written as the sum of electron and phonon contributions:

C = \gamma T + AT^3

So that explains your gamma. Now you just have to set the two terms equal and solve for T. Presumably you have an expression for the heat capacity of phonons in your chapter?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top