Impact speed of an electron in a parallel plate capacitor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of an electron released from rest in a parallel-plate capacitor with a specified electric field strength and plate spacing. The user initially calculated the electron's acceleration using the force equation and then applied a kinematic equation to find the final velocity, arriving at an incorrect speed. The error was identified as using the mass of a proton instead of the electron's mass in the calculations. An alternative method suggested involves calculating the energy imparted to the electron as it travels through the electric field, which relates to its kinetic energy. Correcting the mass used will yield the accurate speed of the electron upon reaching the positive plate.
ShilpaM
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The electric field strength is 2.50×104 N/C inside a parallel-plate capacitor with a 1.20 mm spacing. An electron is released from rest at the negative plate. What is the electron's speed when it reaches the positive plate?

Homework Equations


F = eE = ma
vf2 = vi2 + 2ad

The Attempt at a Solution


First, I used F = eE to figure out the force acting on the electron and then divided the force by the mass to get the electron's acceleration in the electric field:

a = eE/m = (1.60×10-19 C)(2.50×104 N/C) / (1.67×10-27 kg) = 2.3952×1012 m/s2

Then I used a kinematic equation to figure out the final velocity:

vf2 = vi2 + 2ad (vi = 0 since the electron starts at rest)
vf = √(2ad) = √(2(2.3952×1012 m/s2)(1.2×10-3 m)) = 7.58×104 m/s

But apparently this is not the answer. Can anyone please tell me what I'm doing wrong? I've checked over my work several times. Any help would be much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've used the mass of a proton rather than that of an electron.

Note that you could also calculate the energy imparted to the electron by traveling through the electric field for the given distance. That'll end up as its kinetic energy...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top