Importance of Low Resistance per Unit Length in Electrical Cables

AI Thread Summary
Low resistance per unit length in electrical cables is crucial for efficient operation, especially with long connections to appliances. It allows for a larger current to flow, which is necessary for appliances to function properly. However, higher currents can lead to increased power dissipation, reducing efficiency and safety. The resistance of the cable affects the overall performance, as lower resistance minimizes energy loss as heat. Ultimately, maintaining low resistance is essential for both effective power delivery and minimizing energy waste.
Kushal
Messages
438
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Some electrical appliances are used with long cables to connect to them to the electrical supply. State and explain 2 reasons why these cables should have a low resistance per unit length.


The Attempt at a Solution



well for the long cables, a low resistance per unit length would mean a low resistance for the cable itself. a larger current will flow.

i cannot see any advantage in that. rather the cables will be less safe with a larger current. the power dissipated, I2R, will be larger, hence less efficient.

so i don't know...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kushal said:
Some electrical appliances

well for the long cables, a low resistance per unit length would mean a low resistance for the cable itself. a larger current will flow …

Hi Kushal! :smile:

No … you've completely ignored the resistance of the appliance

it is (mostly) that resistance which determines the current, I.

So the current is more-or-less fixed by the appliance.

So the effect of the resistance of the wire is … ? :smile:
 
yeah you're right, i completely ignored that. a small current might not be able to operate the appliance.

errmm i still can't find the second reason... a hint would be great...lol

thnks
 
Kushal said:
yeah you're right, i completely ignored that. a small current might not be able to operate the appliance.

errmm i still can't find the second reason... a hint would be great...lol

thnks

It looks like you were on to the second drawback in your first try.
 
EDIT: Nevermind, got resistance confused with impedance.

Anyway, yes you were close. Think of the Thevenin equivalence circuit.
 
Last edited:
You guys have completely forgot that the higher the voltage of the current moving through the mains power the less energy that is lost through heat and for that to work the resistance must be low.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top