Impossable with a pump to suck water from a lake

  • Thread starter Thread starter JBemp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lake Pump Water
AI Thread Summary
A pump cannot effectively suck water from a lake if placed 15 meters above the water due to the limitations of atmospheric pressure and gravity. Pumps do not create suction; instead, they remove air or water already in the line, allowing ambient air pressure to push water up. The maximum height water can be lifted by a pump is approximately 10 meters due to the pressure exerted by the atmosphere, which is about 14.7 psi. This is further illustrated by the mercury barometer, where the height of mercury is significantly greater than that of water due to its density. Therefore, a pump positioned 15 meters above the water level exceeds the practical limits of suction.
JBemp
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hiya
my question is

Why is it impossible with a pump to suck water from a lake if you place the pump 15 meters above the water


I think it has somthing to do with gravity but if anyone could explain it in detail that would be great

Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Well yes the water is held down by gravity.
 


yes but i was thinking what stops me from making a pump so large the i can pump anyways
 


Pumps don't suck. They can only remove the air/water that is already in the line. Then the ambient air pressure pushes the water up. 14.7 psi = 33 feet of water= 10m of water.
 


Have you ever looked at a mercury barometer where the column of mercury is about 760 mm (millimeters) high, with vacuum above the column, and air pressure pushing from the bottom? There is no way that the suction (vacuum) can be made any better. Because the mercury density is 13.6 times higher than water, the absolute max column of water an ideal pump can suck is 760 mm x 13.6 = 10.34 meters (at sea level).
 
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top