Impulse/final velocity question confusion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a confusion regarding momentum calculations in a physics problem. The user questions the transition from 50 kgm/s to 30 kgm/s in the equation, suggesting it should be 70 kgm/s instead. Clarification is provided that north is considered positive, making south negative, which affects the signs in the equation. The correct interpretation of subtracting a negative value resolves the confusion, confirming that the calculations align with the physics principles. Ultimately, the misunderstanding was clarified through careful attention to the signs in the equation.
student07
Messages
36
Reaction score
1
I uploaded my question below; basically I am confused in part b) where they show that:
50 kgm/s = (5kg)v2 - (5kg)(-4m/s) then they say that
30 kgm/s = 5kg v2, but shouldn't it be 70 kgm/s = 5kg v2?

As noted at the beginning of the question North is positive and thus since the cart moves south is negative (-4m/s).
Could this be a typo ?
 

Attachments

  • hw.PNG
    hw.PNG
    26.9 KB · Views: 463
Physics news on Phys.org
If south is negative and that was the initial direction of momentum then the second term is written correctly. Note carefully the signs (subtracting a negative on the RHS) so the second line is correct because the equation reads (without units) 50 = 5v + 20.
 
yeah I totally missed the subtracting a negative on the RHS that makes more sense now thank you
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Back
Top