Impulse and Momentum Conservation for a Frictionless Cart

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a 2 kg frictionless cart that collides with a wall, rebounds, and the implications for impulse and momentum conservation. Participants explore the definitions of the system and the conditions under which momentum may or may not be conserved.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of impulse and question the conservation of momentum, considering different definitions of the system involved. There is a focus on whether the wall's lack of velocity affects momentum conservation.

Discussion Status

Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, with some participants suggesting that momentum conservation depends on how the system is defined. Guidance is offered regarding the need to consider the wall and its connection to the Earth in the momentum analysis.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the potential for vibrations caused by the collision to affect momentum considerations. The original poster is encouraged to reflect on the implications of including the wall and Earth in the momentum analysis.

Nelson2436
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 2 kg frictionless cart with a velocity of 6 m/s hits a wall and rebounds with a velocity of 4 m/s. What is the impulse on the cart by the wall? Is momentum conserved?

Homework Equations


J = Δp

The Attempt at a Solution


J = Δp = pf-pi = mvf-mvi = 2kg (-4m/s -6m/s) = -20 kgm/s

I think I solved the part for the impulse correctly but needed some help with the reasoning for the second part of the question. I think that the momentum would not be conserved in this case because there is an impulse so there's a net force on the system. On the other hand the system is not defined so the momentum can be conserved if the system is considered to be both the cart and the wall, since the wall would experience an impulse from the cart. Which line of reasoning is correct?[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct. The system is not defined so both arguments you make are valid. Who knows what the question setter intended.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nelson2436
Nelson2436 said:
On the other hand the system is not defined so the momentum can be conserved if the system is considered to be both the cart and the wall, since the wall would experience an impulse from the cart.
Okay, what is the velocity of the wall? What is the momentum of the wall?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nelson2436
insightful said:
Okay, what is the velocity of the wall? What is the momentum of the wall?
The wall has no velocity and no momentum, unless the vibrations caused by the collision are considered. So does that mean that momentum is not conserved because there's an impulse?
 
Nelson2436 said:
The wall has no velocity and no momentum, unless the vibrations caused by the collision are considered. So does that mean that momentum is not conserved because there's an impulse?

To have conservation of momentum, you must take into acccount not just the wall but what it is attached to - probably the Earth.

These questions that ask whether momentum is conserved make no sense. Momentum is always conserved in a collision, as long as you consider all objects involved. It would be better to ask "discuss conservation of momentum in this case".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nelson2436
PeroK said:
These questions that ask whether momentum is conserved make no sense. Momentum is always conserved in a collision, as long as you consider all objects involved. It would be better to ask "discuss conservation of momentum in this case".
I would suggest that one does not tell a teacher or professor that their question makes no sense. Many times it is the solver's job to make sense of the problem. Otherwise agree.

OP, you need to convince yourself that the momentum of the wall and therefore the Earth changes in this problem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nelson2436

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K