In a railgun the lorentz force causes an object to be propelled

AI Thread Summary
In a railgun, the Lorentz force propels an object due to electromagnetic forces generated by current flowing through the rails. Non-magnetic metals like aluminum can be used for both rails and armature because the magnetic field is induced by the current, not by the material's magnetic properties. Aluminum is favored for its low density and cost-effectiveness, allowing for faster acceleration compared to heavier metals like steel. The key factor in railgun design is the conductivity of the material, making aluminum an ideal choice. Magnetic materials are not necessary for generating the required magnetic field in this context.
Bugmenot
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In a railgun the lorentz force causes an object to be propelled in a direction because of an electromagnetic force caused by running a current through the "rails". How come you can use aluminium or another such non-magnetic metal as both rails and armature? Surely only a magentic metal would work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bugmenot said:
In a railgun the lorentz force causes an object to be propelled in a direction because of an electromagnetic force caused by running a current through the "rails". How come you can use aluminium or another such non-magnetic metal as both rails and armature? Surely only a magentic metal would work?
You are interested in the ability of the metal to conduct electricity. The magnetic field is due to the current in the rail and projectile/armature. The design does not allow for the use of high permeability core material since there is no core.

AM
 
Bugmenot said:
In a railgun the lorentz force causes an object to be propelled in a direction because of an electromagnetic force caused by running a current through the "rails". How come you can use aluminium or another such non-magnetic metal as both rails and armature? Surely only a magentic metal would work?
First of all, Al is cheap/inexpensive.

The effect is I x B, and B is induced by the currents in the rails, so a magnetic material is not necessary.

Al is relatively low density (sg ~2.7) as compared to steel (sg ~ 8.0), so for the same size, the Al would have much less mass, and consequently for a given force, it would accelerate faster.

I have seen railguns with copper rails which were used to fire steel projectiles - up to several km/s - for a relatively short gun.
 
So, in english, what your saying is it doesn't have to be ferromagnetic to get a magnetic field. Thanks
 
The magnetic field is produced by the current in the aluminum wire and NOT by a magnetic moment in a permanent magnet. Therefore, conductivity of the conductor is what is important, an Al is a very good conductor, and it is cheap.
 
Why can't they use maglev to fire projectiles?

No contact, no friction!
 
Probably because you would have to have a very long vacuum tube from your device to your target for it to make any significant difference.
 
Back
Top