In an ionic equation, how do you know what pairs with what? For example:?

  • Thread starter Thread starter land_of_ice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Example Ionic
AI Thread Summary
In ionic equations, the formation of compounds like PbI2 (s) from aqueous ions is determined by solubility rules, which indicate whether combinations of cations and anions will form a solid precipitate. The discussion emphasizes that while the order of ions in the final equation can vary, it is essential to identify spectator ions, such as K+ and NO3-, which do not participate in the reaction. To predict which ions will precipitate, one must evaluate all possible combinations of the ions present and apply solubility rules to determine which salts are insoluble. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding these rules to accurately predict the products of a reaction. Overall, recognizing the interactions between ions and their solubility is crucial for constructing correct ionic equations.
land_of_ice
Messages
136
Reaction score
0
molecular:
Pb(NO3)2 (aq) + 2 KI (aq) ----->2KNO3 (aq) + Pbl2 (s)
Ionic equation
Pb2+ (aq) + 2NO3- (aq) + 2 K (aq) + 2 I- (aq)----->2K+ (aq)+ 2NO3- (aq) + PbI2 (s)

I know why they break apart in the ionic part, its because ionic things aer broken up, but how would you know that they join together to form 2K+ (aq)+ 2NO3- (aq) + PbI2 (s) at the end? like in that order?

and one more question, how do you know that when certain things join together, that they form a solid, such as they way PbI2 (s) forms, because at first Pb was (aq), and I2 was (aq) also
 
Physics news on Phys.org
land_of_ice said:
how would you know that they join together to form 2K+ (aq)+ 2NO3- (aq) + PbI2 (s) at the end? like in that order?

Order doesn't matter, 2NO3- (aq) + PbI2 (s) + 2K+ (aq) is perfectly valid. Note that K+ and NO3- should be removed, as they are just spectators.

how do you know that when certain things join together, that they form a solid, such as they way PbI2 (s) forms, because at first Pb was (aq), and I2 was (aq) also

Do you know solubility rules?
 
Borek said:
Order doesn't matter, 2NO3- (aq) + PbI2 (s) + 2K+ (aq) is perfectly valid. Note that K+ and NO3- should be removed, as they are just spectators.



Do you know solubility rules?

Can you explain how it uses the solubility rules? Because That's the part I don't understand. I know the solubility rules, just not how the solubility rules affect it and thanks so much for the help
 
You have four ions present: K+, Pb2+, I-, NO3-. Basically you check all combinations that can create a salt (that means cation and anion) and you check if it is soluble or not.

In this particular case there are following combinations possible (do you see why?):
K+ & I-
K+ & NO3-
Pb2+ & I-
Pb2+ & NO3-

Try to apply solubility rules to find out which of the possible salts is insoluble and will precipitate.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top