In circular motion, What does it mean s = r.θ?

AI Thread Summary
The equation s = rθ represents the relationship between arc length (s), radius (r), and angular displacement (θ in radians) in circular motion. It indicates that the arc length is directly proportional to the angle measured in radians. The proof of this relationship relies on the symmetry of the circle, leading to the conclusion that the constant of proportionality is the radius. When the angle is 2π radians, the corresponding arc length is 2πr, confirming that k equals the radius. This fundamental equation is essential for understanding circular motion dynamics.
HCverma
Messages
82
Reaction score
2
In the circular motion, What does it mean by this equation s = r.θ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
S=rø is the formula for arc length, or angular displacement (ø rad).

R is the radius
Ø is the angle measure in radians.
 
arctheta.png


The scheme is not perfect but I think you get the idea...

If you want to know how this equation is proved:

Due to symmetry of the circle we can assume that the arc length ##s## will be directly proportional to the angle ##\theta##. So it will be

##s=k\theta## (1) for some constant k.

But we know for angle ##2\pi## corresponds arc length ##2\pi r##. So if we apply equation (1) for those pair of data we get

##2\pi r=k (2\pi)## from which we can deduce that the constant k is actually the radius of the circle, ##k=r##.
 

Attachments

  • arctheta.png
    arctheta.png
    7 KB · Views: 1,267
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Dale
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top