In photoelectric effect, why does photon prefer K shell electron?

amylase
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In photoelectric effect, why does photon prefer K shell electron?

Asked differently:
In photoelectric effect, why does photon prefer electron of closest binding energy, rather than going for another electron of much lower binding energy?

Homework Equations



http://www.sprawls.org/ppmi2/INTERACT/

The Attempt at a Solution



This is what I understand about photoelectric interaction: If a photon's energy matches or is higher than the binding energy of an electron, the photon will be absorbed by that electron. This allows the electron to overcome its binding energy and be liberated from the atom. So for example a photon can be absorbed by a K shell electron which then escapes.

I am cool with above.

My question is: if that photon had enough energy to break free K shell electron, that photon could have broken free an L shell, or M shell electron instead (they are of lower binding energies hence easier to liberate). Why would the photon preferentially choose to free the one that's hardest to free (K electron)? That photon could easily have chosen to free the M shell electron and given it more residual energy to run away with.

Hope my question is clear: why does photon prefer K shell electron in photoelectric effect when it could easily choose an easier target (eg. M shell electron)?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check: does the photoelectric effect prefer the K shell? How do you know this? Does your own reference support this idea?

eg. in a solid metal, wouldn't the ejected electrons come from one of the crystal structure bands rather than from atomic shells?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top