Increasing object exposure time under UVC when rotated?

  • Thread starter Thread starter joniverson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Increasing Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effectiveness of UVC light for sanitization when using a rotating platform to change the orientation of objects. Participants explore the implications of rotation on exposure time and UV dose calculations, considering various factors such as object shape and light intensity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes using UVC for sanitization and proposes a rotating platform to automate the process of changing object orientation, seeking to understand how this affects exposure time.
  • Another participant questions the effectiveness of the current method, asking about testing outcomes, object shapes, and the assumptions regarding UVC lamp performance in an enclosed space.
  • A participant clarifies the formula for UV dose and inquires whether individual dosages can be summed to achieve the required total, given that no side of the object is under constant light during rotation.
  • One response discusses the relationship between UV dose, intensity, and angle of incidence, suggesting that rotation may lead to longer exposure times due to varying angles affecting energy distribution.
  • Another participant suggests temporarily covering the lights during object flipping as an alternative to using a rotating platform.
  • A later reply indicates a decision against the rotating platform due to insufficient information, opting instead for additional illumination for shadowed areas.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the effectiveness and practicality of using a rotating platform for UVC sanitization. There is no consensus on the impact of rotation on exposure time or the best approach to take, as some participants raise concerns while others propose alternative methods.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of empirical testing data for the proposed methods, uncertainties regarding the effectiveness of UVC in different orientations, and the need for further clarification on the setup and assumptions made about UVC exposure.

joniverson
Messages
44
Reaction score
13
I use UVC to sanitize. However, since I sometimes use HID lights, when it comes time to flip over or change the angle of objects and the light is deactivated, there is a 10-15 min cooldown period before the light will reignite. I have been thinking of using a rotating platform that would have a one minute rotation period for any object placed on top of it. I've normally been using 15 min per side before manually changing object orientation or flipping, but since the rotation would now be continuous and automatic, how would this affect exposure time? Thank you.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
We need help:
1. have you have tested/verified the outcomes of sanitizing using your current single turn method method? How do you test?
2. what shape (cylindrical or whatever) objects has the old method worked on?
3. can we assume the UVC lamp "works" in an enclosed space, and the walls of the space are able to reflect UVC effectively?
 
Sorry, I don't think I was clear.

Basically, I want to know the information regarding the formula:

UV dose μWs/cm2 = UV intensity μW/cm2 × exposure time (seconds)

Currently, for a non-rotating square object, it takes 15 minutes per side to attain the necessary 2,500 μW·s/cm2.

Now, if the object is automatically rotated, and takes one minute to complete a rotation, how does this effect dose? What about the fact that no side of the object is under the light constantly... is a constant UV exposure needed, or can individual dosages be added to achieve the required total?

Thanks again.
 
Thanks that helps.
The UV dose is the product of UV intensity (expressed as energy per unit surface area) and residence time.
So, this means that for a flat surface (like a box) the angle of incidence changes and reduces the energy per surface are large.

So the answer depends item shape, but in most cases I can think of I would say yes, definitely a lot longer. This is why I asked about testing.

Take a box - the DNI (direct normal irradiance, fancy term for beam intensity) is usually given for a 90° angle of incidence. Rotation takes the item surfaces out of 90° for most of the time. I do not trust myself to work out times calculations for you. Without sterility testing for certification available, the calculation could have bad results.

And I do not know of a reference, offhand. But I'll bet @Dale and @Choppy do have better background than I do.

And as a guess, your times will work out to be greater than your current 4*15 minutes + 4*10 minutes, but I don't know for sure.
 
joniverson said:
since I sometimes use HID lights, when it comes time to flip over or change the angle of objects and the light is deactivated, there is a 10-15 min cooldown period before the light will reignite. I have been thinking of using a rotating platform that would have a one minute rotation period for any object placed on top of it. I've normally been using 15 min per side before manually changing object orientation or flipping
I guess I don't understand the setup very well (maybe post a couple pictures?), but can't you just temporarily cover the light(s) while you flip the object? Or wear enough protection so that you don't need to turn off the lights to do the flipping?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G and jim mcnamara
Due to lack of available information, I have decided against a rotating platform and will use extra illumination for the shadow sides. Thanks again to those who replied.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara and berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K