Independence of Random Variables

kingwinner
Messages
1,266
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose X is a discrete random variable with probability mass function
pX(x)=1/5, if x=-2,-1,0,1,2
pX(x)=0, otherwise
Let Y=X2. Are X and Y independent? Prove using definitions and theorems.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


The random variables X and Y are independent <=> pX,Y(x,y)=pX(x)pY(y) for ALL x,y E R

But the trouble here is that we don't have pX,Y(x,y) and pY(y). What can we do?

Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You will first have to ccalculate pY and pX,Y.
For example
<br /> p_Y(1)=P(Y=1)=P(X=1\vee X=-1)=P(X=1)+P(X=-1)=1/5+1/5=2/5<br />
IN the same way calculate pY(y) for the remaining values in the range of Y, and similarly for pX,Y. Of course you would suspect X and Y not to be independent, so it would suffice to find one case where the joint distribution does not factorize.
 
How can I find the joint mass function pX,Y from their marginal mass functions?
 
<br /> p_{X,Y}(1,2)=P(X=1\vee Y=2)=P(X=1\vee X^2=2)...?<br />
Which X values contribute to this probabbility. They should be such that X=1 and X^2=2:smile:
 
Pere Callahan said:
<br /> p_{X,Y}(1,2)=P(X=1\vee Y=2)=P(X=1\vee X^2=2)...?<br />
Which X values contribute to this probabbility. They should be such that X=1 and X^2=2:smile:

How is this possible? Is the probability 0?
What other cases do I have to do?
 
kingwinner said:
How is this possible? Is the probability 0?
What other cases do I have to do?
Yes, the prob. is zero. Either do all remaining cases or just compare
<br /> p_{X,Y}(1,2)=0<br />
to
<br /> p_{X}(1)p_{Y}(2)=?<br />
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top