Independent virtual particle after mind experiment annihilation

NoelyG
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Independent virtual particle after "mind experiment" annihilation

Hello good people,

Probably a bit of a silly question, but I have been entertaining a bit of a thought experiment about the following. Consider the following:

1. A virtual photon is exchanged between two electrons to mediate the electro-magnetic force.
2. The photon can only travel at the speed of light, so during its travel time, one electron is completely annihilated
3. Does the virtual photon still exist, or wouldn't it have been emitted in the first place?

Probably a silly question, but if any of you could shed some light on this it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You are confusing a real photon with a virtual photon. Virtual photons are mathematical artifacts which are not limited to any speed or energy, we refer to this as being off mass shell. If a real photon is emitted it exists until it is re-absorbed.
 


Thanks for the reply cosmik,

I guess what I was curious about was the following:

1. The electro-magnetic force can not be "communicated" faster than the speed of light
2. We have two electrons separated by a distance x
3. If one electron "pops" out of existence at time t, will the other electron still feel a repulsive force for x/c?

You say that virtual photons, which, mathematically at least, communicate the electro-magnetic force but are not limited in speed or energy - however, if this is the case, why is it that the electro-magnetic force is only communicated at the speed of light?

Sorry if these are silly questions, I am no doubt missing something fundamental. Thanks for your assistance.

EDIT: Am I correct in saying that the electro-magnetic force is communicated via virtual photons (i.e. unobservable) rather than real photons (observable)?
 
Last edited:


You have to be careful when you talk about EM. The case where the field is static is different from the case when EM waves are emitted. The energy in a static field is carried by virtual photons. The energy in EM waves are carried by real photons. In the static case there is nothing to propagate the field is just there as it has always been, that's why it is called static. When a charge is accelerated it will emit EM waves which are comprised of real photons which propagate at c.

Your thought experiment violates the rules, an electron cannot pop out of existence, that would violate conservation of energy and charge, if you break the rules predictions cannot be made.
 


Thanks for taking the time to educate me cosmik, makes sense now
 


The said statements are not silly, If we thought without violating any of the physics laws for example the bulb of 60 watt will realize one photon in priscribed time.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top