Induced Charged on a Grounded Sphere

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the total induced charge Q on a grounded conducting sphere due to a charge +q placed at z=3R_0. The user derived a surface charge density σ(z) using cylindrical coordinates but struggled to integrate it to find Q, expecting the result to be Q=-q/3. There is a suggestion to use spherical coordinates instead of cylindrical for a more straightforward solution. Participants agree that the problem has an elegant solution, emphasizing that much of the provided data is irrelevant. The consensus is that the expected answer is indeed Q=-q/3.
Edward Candle
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A grounded conducting sphere of radius R_0 is centered at the origin. If we place a charge +q at z=3R_0, calculate the total induced charge Q on the sphere surface.
Relevant Equations
\sigma = -\epsilon_{zero} dV/dn(R=R_0)
I've come to the result (using cylindrical coordinates)
#\sigma (z) = (-2q) / (pi*sqrt(R_0*(10R_0-6z)^3) )#
and i tried to get #Q# by integrating #2*pi*sqrt(R_0^2-z^2)*\sigma(z)dz# from #-R_0# to #R_0#.
But i can't solve that integral. I tried solving it numerically with arbitrary values and it didn't make sense.
I figured it should be independent of #R_0#, and we should come to# Q=-q/3#...
Any help please? Am i integrating it wrong? Or is it that the charge distribution i got might be wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
sorry i nover posted before i thought if i wrote eqs in latex it would just come out right
 
The latex needs to be enclosed in pairs of hash symbols.
Please post your working.

Homework Statement:: A grounded conducting sphere of radius ##R_0## is centered at the origin. If we place a charge +q at ##z=3R_0##, calculate the total induced charge Q on the sphere surface.
Relevant Equations:: ##\sigma = -\epsilon_{zero} dV/dn(R=R_0)##
I've come to the result (using cylindrical coordinates)
##\sigma (z) = \frac{-2q} {\pi\sqrt{R_0(10R_0-6z)^3} }##
and i tried to get Q by integrating ##2\pi\sqrt{R_0^2-z^2}\sigma(z)dz ## from -##R_0 ## to ##R_0.##
we should come to Q=-q/3...
 
rude man said:
I'd go with spherical, not cylindrical, coordinates - if I tried to solve it via a coordinate system.
.
PS this is a trick question.
I wouldn't call it a trick question, but there is certainly an elegant solution. Almost a one-liner.
 
rude man said:
I would call it a trick question when most of the given data is irrelevant, which it is.
Are you referring to the "relevant equation"? I see nothing else irrelevant.
 
rude man said:
I'm referring to everything except. q.
Remember, the correct answer is given as -q/3 (with which I agree).
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top