Induced EMF ~ Faraday's Law/Lenz's Law

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding induced electromotive force (emf) using Faraday's and Lenz's laws, particularly in scenarios involving circular wire loops. The user is struggling with calculating average induced emf without knowing the number of turns in the coil, but it is clarified that each problem refers to a single loop. The correct formula for induced emf is provided, emphasizing the importance of the area of the loop, which is calculated using the formula for the area of a circle. Additionally, the approach to finding average emf by calculating the initial and final emf values is discussed, assuming uniform changes in orientation or magnetic field. The conversation concludes with a suggestion to refer to external resources for further clarification on the topic.
Kali8972
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I'm having a lot of trouble with the following questions. I was wondering if someone could steer me in the right direction and tell me what I'm doing wrong.

I suppose my biggest problem is I don't understand how to do these without knowing the number of turns in the coil. Here's what I've done so far:

1. [GianPSE3 29.P.002.] A 20 cm diameter circular loop of wire lies in a plane perpendicular to a 0.80 T magnetic field. It is removed from the field in 0.10 s. What is the average induced emf?

2. [GianPSE3 29.P.005.] A 8.0 cm diameter loop of wire is initially oriented perpendicular to a 1.2 T magnetic field. It is rotated so that its plane is parallel to the field direction in 0.40 s. What is the average induced emf in the loop?

3. [GianPSE3 29.P.006.] A 7.6 cm diameter wire coil is initially oriented so that its plane is perpendicular to a magnetic field of 0.63 T pointing up. During the course of 0.12 s, the field is changed to one of 0.25T pointing down. What is the average induced emf in the coil?

Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated! Thanks so much!

Work is in attatched pictures! Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • problem1.jpg
    problem1.jpg
    24.4 KB · Views: 907
  • problem2.jpg
    problem2.jpg
    31 KB · Views: 2,205
  • problem3.jpg
    problem3.jpg
    37.2 KB · Views: 782
Physics news on Phys.org
I've not seen the images but it sounds like each problem is considering 1 loop of wire.

I vaguely remember the following equation:

induced emf = - rate of change of flux = - N x A x B x sin (theta)

N = number of loops
A = area enclosed by loops
B = strength of magnetic field
theta = angle between plane of loop/s and magnetic field

That should be all you need assuming I've remembered the equation correctly.

(Does anyone know how make proper equations in this forum?)
 
Hmm.. I don't know why they don't show up

They're located here however:

http://www.pitt.edu/~slm17/problem1.jpg
http://www.pitt.edu/~slm17/problem2.jpg
http://www.pitt.edu/~slm17/problem3.jpg

That helps a lot knowing it's one loop. I was getting really confused on that part. For the area in problems 2 and 3 do you know what I do for it? I'm not sure on the shape so should I just square it?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
When they refer to a 'loop', they mean a circular piece of wire so the area is just pi*radius^2 for both 2 and 3 (as far as I can tell).

To find average emf, calculate the beginning emf, the end emf and then average the two results. This will only work if the change in orientation of the loop or the change of field is uniform but that does seem to be the case so it should work just fine.
 
Last edited:
it looks like the equation you should be using is something like

emf = -(rate of change of flux w.r.t. time)
= -d/dt (NAB sin theta)
= -d/dt (NAB sin (wt))
= -w*NAB cos (wt)

Go to the following link and see page 19:

http://www.cs.ntu.edu.au/homepages/jmitroy/sph102/sect08.pdf

I hope I'm helping more than hindering :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top