Induced Emf in an Inductor in an LRC circuit

AI Thread Summary
At time t=0, when the switch is closed, the inductor behaves like a broken wire, resulting in no current flow through it. The initial voltage across the capacitor is zero, and thus the potential difference across the 50Ω resistor in parallel with it is also zero. The circuit can be simplified to a 50Ω resistance with a 40V battery. Although the current in the inductor is initially zero, it will change over time, leading to a non-zero induced emf in the future. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the dynamics of current change in inductors within LRC circuits.
asb5468
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the circuit shown in the figure, the switch S is closed at time t=0 with no initial charge on the capacitor. What is the induced emf if the inductor at time t=0?


Homework Equations


ε=-LdI/dt


The Attempt at a Solution


Initially the inductor acts like a broken wire in that no current can go through it so the potential difference across the 100 Ω resistor is 0. The capacitor initially has 0 resistance, so all the current will flow through there and the voltage across the 50Ω resistor in parallel with the capacitor (V4) will also be zero. So a time t=0 it acts like a simple circuit with resistance 50 Ω and εbattery 40 V. I am unsure if there would also be a potential difference across the inductor due to an induced emf. I don't really know how to find the current as a function of time for this combination circuit so I'm not sure if dI/dt would then be zero, making the induced emf zero. Any help is appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-04-18 at 1.58.49 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-04-18 at 1.58.49 PM.png
    21.1 KB · Views: 525
Physics news on Phys.org
dI/dt does not equal zero in the inductor. Although at time t=0 there is no current in the inducter, at some future time there will be a current in the inductor.
 
Last edited:
paisiello2 said:
dI/dt does not equal zero in the inductor. Although at time t=0 there is no current in the inducter, at some future time it won't be.

To expand on this, what is the rate of change of the voltage across the capacitor immediately after the switch is closed?
 
The rate of change of voltage on, and current thru, the capacitor is irrelevant.
What is the initial voltage across the capacitor? Ergo, across the L-R arm? Ergo, across L?
 
rude man said:
The rate of change of voltage on, and current thru, the capacitor is irrelevant.
What is the initial voltage across the capacitor? Ergo, across the L-R arm? Ergo, across L?
Yes.

rude man is correct.

I must have had some brain flatulence .
 
SammyS said:
Yes.

rude man is correct.

I must have had some brain flatulence .

That's funny, Sammy!
Anyway, welcome to the club ...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top