Induced EMF: Solenoid in Square Loop

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the induced EMF in a square loop surrounding a solenoid with a time-varying current. The relevant equation for induced EMF is given as ε = -N(dφ/dt), where φ represents magnetic flux. Participants emphasize the need to correctly apply Ampere's circuital law to determine the magnetic field of the solenoid, as it is not constant. There is confusion regarding the integration process and whether the solenoid and cylinder are considered the same entity. Understanding the relationship between the solenoid's magnetic field and the electric flux is crucial for solving the problem.
triplebeem1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The solenoid has N turns of wire around a cylinder. The radius of the cylinder is "a" and length is "b." THe current of the solenoid varies as I(t)= I_{0}(1 - e^-\alphat) . I_{0} and \alpha are positive constants. Around the solenoid is a square loop of wire with side length "c." The axis of the square loop is parallel to and coincides with the axis of the solenoid. What is the magnitude of the induced EMF in the square loop?





Homework Equations



\epsilon = -N\frac{d\phi}{dt}




The Attempt at a Solution



\epsilon = -N\frac{d\phi}{dt}

d\epsilon = -N\frac{dBA}{dt}

\epsilon = -NA\intdB

\epsilon = (-NA)[(\muNI)/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thats not strictly correct. The magnetic field of the solenoid is not a constant which you can integrate as you did. You are given the constants a and b for a reason. You can find the magnetic field by using ampere's circuital law. That is what you must integrate.
 
Would I need to use the B-field of the solenoid to find the electric flux and then finally the inductance? I think I'm having a hard time grasping the concept of the question. I'm assuming the solenoid and cylinder are the same. Is that what you assume as well?
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top