Induced voltage in a coil in a three phase permanent magnet axial flux generator

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the design of a three-phase permanent magnet axial flux generator and the complexities of calculating the induced voltage in copper coils. The voltage is defined by Faraday's law, which involves the number of coil turns and the change in magnetic flux over time. A key point raised is the distinction between magnetic flux (measured in Webers) and magnetic flux density (measured in Teslas), emphasizing that the area considered should be the section of the coil encircling the flux. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding these concepts to accurately determine the induced voltage and suggests that the area of interest is not the total coil area but rather the effective area influenced by the magnetic field. Clarifying these distinctions is essential for proper application of Faraday's law in generator design.
Frederik
Messages
6
Reaction score
2
I am currently designing a three phase permanent magnet axial flux generator, but have a question regarding the voltage induced in the copper coils. Faraday's law defines this voltage as the number of turns in the coil, times the change in flux (external magnetic field times area of coil) over the change in time. As i tried to illustrate in this sketch:

upload_2018-3-14_11-26-56.png


However in my generator (and to my knowledge, in most others), the interaction between the coils and the flux is a bit different. I am not sure how to define the area in my case, as the source of flux is not passing through the entire coil, but instead parallel to it. The sketch below describes the basic principle of my generator:

upload_2018-3-14_11-28-29.png


I just assumed that the area is that of the coil section affected by the magnet, instead of the total coil area, as shown here:

upload_2018-3-14_11-41-2.png


My question is, if the above assumption is correct?

Any help is greatly appreciated
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-3-14_11-26-56.png
    upload_2018-3-14_11-26-56.png
    111.7 KB · Views: 1,338
  • upload_2018-3-14_11-28-29.png
    upload_2018-3-14_11-28-29.png
    113.7 KB · Views: 1,773
  • upload_2018-3-14_11-41-2.png
    upload_2018-3-14_11-41-2.png
    45.8 KB · Views: 1,136
Engineering news on Phys.org
The general form of the Faraday's law has a differential form - which in turn means you usually need calculus to find the voltage. The non-differential version that you refer to is a very specific case, quite easy to apply when it works, but outside of its applicability it fails miserably (as you have just realized).
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara, anorlunda and Frederik
Any text on machines covers this in detail. Learning the details of generator operation is too much for posting here.

Claude
EE
PhD student
 
What counts is the amount of flux encircled by the coil. That's why your statement above says
Frederik said:
number of turns in the coil, times the change in flux
Note it says flux not flux density.

Flux is measured in Webers.

Frederik said:
(external magnetic field times area of coil)
That infers you are thinking of the magnetic field in terms of flux density , which is Teslas and usually represented by uppercase B,
instead of flux which is Webers usually represented by Greek letter "phi" Φ.
A Tesla is one Weber per square meter.
That's why you multiply by area, to change from Teslas that are present both inside and outside your coil to Webers that are encircled by it.

Think in Webers and your conundrum should disappear.

Frederik said:
I just assumed that the area is that of the coil section affected by the magnet, instead of the total coil area, as shown here:
Nope. It's however many Webers the coil encircles. In your second picture with magnet smaller than coil you'll very soon encircle all the Webers, as in your first picture.

Being aware of that distinction should help you digest whatever textbook you consult.
B is not Φ so pay close attention to which symbol is in the author's formula.

old jim
 
  • Like
Likes cabraham
How would you calculate the alternating current induced in the coils?
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top