Inequality involving positive definite operator

ismaili
Messages
150
Reaction score
0
1.
Given that |\langle f|g\rangle|^2 \leqslant \langle f|f\rangle\langle g|g\rangle
prove that |\langle f|H|g\rangle|^2 \leqslant \langle f|H|f\rangle \langle g|H|g\rangle
where H is a Hermitian and positive definite operator.




3. I tried to identify H|g\rangle as a state and put it into the given inequality, but not so help.

Is there any ideas to prove this inequality? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about trying sqrt(H)?

You will also need to think about the conditions H should meet for its square root to exist.
 
weejee said:
How about trying sqrt(H)?

You will also need to think about the conditions H should meet for its square root to exist.

Thank you so much!
I got it, and in this way, Hermitian and positive definite properties are both used.
Thanks!
 
The problem is kind of silly to begin with. If you can show that

\langle \cdot | H | \cdot \rangle

satisfies the defining properties of an inner product:

1. Positive definite,

2. Linear on second slot,

3. Conjugate-linear on first slot,

then the expression automatically obeys the Schwartz inequality, because the Schwartz inequality is true of inner products in general.
 
Ben Niehoff said:
The problem is kind of silly to begin with. If you can show that

\langle \cdot | H | \cdot \rangle

satisfies the defining properties of an inner product:

1. Positive definite,

2. Linear on second slot,

3. Conjugate-linear on first slot,

then the expression automatically obeys the Schwartz inequality, because the Schwartz inequality is true of inner products in general.


Well, you are right. I keep forget that an inner product doesn't always have to be what we usually consider as 'the inner product'.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top