Inertia and density distribution

AI Thread Summary
Determining the unique density distribution of the Earth based on its mass, radius, and moment of inertia is complex and not straightforward. While geophysicists can estimate density distributions using models, the precise structure of the Earth complicates direct calculations. The moment of inertia provides an average density, but without knowing the exact internal structure, one cannot definitively ascertain how density varies with depth. It is suggested that using the Earth's orbital characteristics could help develop a mass distribution function. Ultimately, while theoretical approaches exist, practical determination of the Earth's density distribution remains challenging.
SWiTCHRiDE
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Assuming I have the mass, radius and moment of inertia of the earth, is it possible to determine the unique density distribution of the earth? The assumtion is the Earth is composed of N shells with constant density and thickness.

I think so, because that's how geophysists do itbut I am not sure why

edit: all i do know is I=(2/5)*M*r^2 and I= (integral) r^2 dm

but i don't know how to equate that to prove that the Earth is denser in the middle.

thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Without knowing the precise structure of a solid, particularly a sphere or oblate spheroid, which is the shape of the earth, it is not possible AFAIK to determine the mass/density distribution.

The integral which describes the moment of inertia gives one a more or less average value, so one gets an effective density.

On the other hand, knowing the total mass, and consequently an average (uniform), by virtue of the Earth's orbit around the sun, one probably could develop a mass distribution (M(r), in polynomial form) and calculate the Moment of Inertia and compare it to a calculation with a uniform density.

A nice reference on Moment of Inertia concepts - http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/mi.html#mi
 
im still confused. i have read that section on inertia at hyperphysics. so if one knows radius, mass and orbital radius it IS possible to determine the mass distribution. (assuming the Earth is spherical)
 
bump...please can somebody help, its the last question of my homework and its due in 1 hour from the time of this post. i don't have a lot of time to pound through a physics book as I am struggling to get MATLAB to display a plot of Newtonian potential for the earth.

thanks.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top