Inertia and density distribution

AI Thread Summary
Determining the unique density distribution of the Earth based on its mass, radius, and moment of inertia is complex and not straightforward. While geophysicists can estimate density distributions using models, the precise structure of the Earth complicates direct calculations. The moment of inertia provides an average density, but without knowing the exact internal structure, one cannot definitively ascertain how density varies with depth. It is suggested that using the Earth's orbital characteristics could help develop a mass distribution function. Ultimately, while theoretical approaches exist, practical determination of the Earth's density distribution remains challenging.
SWiTCHRiDE
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Assuming I have the mass, radius and moment of inertia of the earth, is it possible to determine the unique density distribution of the earth? The assumtion is the Earth is composed of N shells with constant density and thickness.

I think so, because that's how geophysists do itbut I am not sure why

edit: all i do know is I=(2/5)*M*r^2 and I= (integral) r^2 dm

but i don't know how to equate that to prove that the Earth is denser in the middle.

thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Without knowing the precise structure of a solid, particularly a sphere or oblate spheroid, which is the shape of the earth, it is not possible AFAIK to determine the mass/density distribution.

The integral which describes the moment of inertia gives one a more or less average value, so one gets an effective density.

On the other hand, knowing the total mass, and consequently an average (uniform), by virtue of the Earth's orbit around the sun, one probably could develop a mass distribution (M(r), in polynomial form) and calculate the Moment of Inertia and compare it to a calculation with a uniform density.

A nice reference on Moment of Inertia concepts - http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/mi.html#mi
 
im still confused. i have read that section on inertia at hyperphysics. so if one knows radius, mass and orbital radius it IS possible to determine the mass distribution. (assuming the Earth is spherical)
 
bump...please can somebody help, its the last question of my homework and its due in 1 hour from the time of this post. i don't have a lot of time to pound through a physics book as I am struggling to get MATLAB to display a plot of Newtonian potential for the earth.

thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top