Inertia block on inclined surface problem? help with solution?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the rotational inertia of a wheel connected to a block sliding down an inclined surface. The block accelerates at 2.0 m/s² on a frictionless incline of 20 degrees. Participants clarify the relationship between linear and angular acceleration, noting that the linear acceleration of the string equals the block's acceleration. Confusion arises regarding the manipulation of terms in the equations, particularly how r² appears in the calculations. The thread emphasizes understanding the physics behind the equations rather than just the algebraic manipulation.
nchin
Messages
172
Reaction score
0
A wheel of radius 0.20 m is mounted on a frictionless horizontal axis. A massless cord wrapped around the wheel is attaches to a 2.0 kg block that slides on a horizontal frictionless surface inclined at angle θ = 20 degrees with the horizontal. The box accelerates down the surface at 2.0 m/s^(2). What is the rotational inertia of the wheel about the axle?

Solution and picture is on page 32-33
http://mrlee.dreamstation.com/apPhysics/lect/apPhysics_lec_10.pdf

I understand all the steps except the last one where

m1(gsinθ - a1)r2 / a1 / r2 = m1(gsinθ - a1)r2^(2) / a1

why did they divide the denominator a1 by r2? and how did the r2 in the numerator become r2^(2)??


thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that linear acceleration of the string wound round the pulley is the same as a_{1} since the string is assumed that does not extend.

Now linear velocity = radius x angular velocity.

Similarly linear acceleration = radius x angular acceleration.

i.e. a_{2} = r_{2}α_{2}

but a_{2} = a_{1}

therefore a_{1} = r_{2}α_{2}

i.e. α_{2} = \frac{a_{1}}{r_{2}}
 
nchin said:
and how did the r2 in the numerator become r2^(2)??
1/(1/x) = x

x/(1/x) = x^2
 
grzz said:
Note that linear acceleration of the string wound round the pulley is the same as a_{1} since the string is assumed that does not extend.

Now linear velocity = radius x angular velocity.

Similarly linear acceleration = radius x angular acceleration.

i.e. a_{2} = r_{2}α_{2}

but a_{2} = a_{1}

therefore a_{1} = r_{2}α_{2}

i.e. α_{2} = \frac{a_{1}}{r_{2}}

Then how did r2 become r2 ^ (2)?
 
As Doc Al told you.

The denomenator of a denomenator is a numerator.
 
Whoops I thought the alpha was a regular a.

Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top