Inertia Q: Which Frame of Ref Is Inertial?

  • Thread starter Thread starter endaman95
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inertia
AI Thread Summary
An inertial frame of reference is defined as one that is not accelerating, meaning it does not change speed or direction. The discussion evaluates two frames: one fixed to the Sun and another to a laboratory table. While the Sun and stars are in motion and technically not inertial, they can be approximated as such for practical purposes. The laboratory table is considered a better inertial frame due to its stable position. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding inertial frames in physics while encouraging independent problem-solving.
endaman95
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Which of the following is an inertial frame of reference when the measuring sensitivity in not very high?
1. A frame of reference fixed to the Sun and its axes are pointing toward 3 other stars.
2.A frame of reference fixed to a laboratory table.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Im not sure about the sun. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is my understanding of what is meant by an inertial reference frame:

An inertial reference frame is one that is not accelerating, meaning it is not changing speed or direction.

All frames of reference are, at best, approximations to an inertial reference frame. The sun and the stars in the universe are not fixed and are all moving and accelerating. However, for practical purposes we can assume the Earth and the sun are good enough approximations to an inertial reference frame that we can usually ignore the small inertial forces associated with their movement.
 
I was thinking the same thing. Thank you for the answer.
 
paisiello2 said:
Here is my understanding of what is meant by an inertial reference frame:

An inertial reference frame is one that is not accelerating, meaning it is not changing speed or direction.

All frames of reference are, at best, approximations to an inertial reference frame. The sun and the stars in the universe are not fixed and are all moving and accelerating. However, for practical purposes we can assume the Earth and the sun are good enough approximations to an inertial reference frame that we can usually ignore the small inertial forces associated with their movement.

Please remember not to do the student's homework for them. It is okay to provide hints, ask questions, suggest search terms, etc. But the student must do the bulk of the work on their schoolwork questions.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top