Solving Electric Field & Potential of Infinitely Long Rod

  • Thread starter Thread starter germx3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rod
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the electric field and potential of an infinitely long charged rod. Part (a) is addressed using Gauss' Law, demonstrating that the electric field inside the rod points radially outward with a magnitude of E = ρr/2ε₀. For part (b), the challenge lies in calculating the potential difference from the rod's surface to its axis, utilizing the formula V = -∫ E · dr. The integration requires applying cylindrical coordinates and substituting the derived electric field into the integral. The higher potential is at the rod's surface compared to its axis.
germx3
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The problem:

An infinitely long rod of radius R carries a uniform volume charge
density ρ (ρ > 0).

(a) Show how to use Gauss' Law to prove that the
electric field inside this rod points radially
outward and has magnitude:

E = \rho r/2\epsilon_0

(b) Integrate the electric field over an appropriate
displacement to find the potential difference from
the rod's surface to its axis. State explicitly
which of those two locations is at the higher
potential.


My answer:

I solved for part (a) using a Gaussian surface symmetry and got this as my final answer.

E(2 \pi rL) = \rho r/2 \epsilon_0
E = \rho r/2\epsilon_0

I am having a hard time starting part (b). I am not sure where to start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Electric potencial is a path integral of electric intensity from point A to point B
 
More specifically the formula is V = -\int^0_{R} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{r}. In this case since you've derived the expression in cylindrical coordinates you might as well make use of cylindrical basis vectors for the line integral. Just substitute all the values into the integration, find the dot product and integrate.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top