Information on X-rays and Gamma Rays

AI Thread Summary
X-ray energies increase with atomic number (Z), originating from photon emissions as electrons transition between atomic shells, with hydrogen having the lowest energy X-rays at 13.6 eV. The highest energy X-rays, approximately 142 keV, correspond to fermium (Z=100). Gamma-rays, which have characteristic wavelengths as well, originate from nuclear transitions and are significantly higher in energy due to the stronger nuclear force compared to the Coulomb force binding electrons. This characteristic allows for the identification of materials based on their emitted radiation signatures, useful in portable radiation analyzers. The discussion highlights the relationship between atomic structure and radiation energy levels.
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
22,340
Reaction score
7,137
X-ray energies increase with atomic number, Z. X-rays originate from photon emissions as electrons drop back into the K and L shells of atoms. Thus they have characteristic wavelengths.

Hydrogen has the lowest energy X-rays (Ek=13.6 eV) which is the first ionzation potential. It has one electron in the K-shell.

The highest energy is about 142 keV, which corresponds to Z=100 (Fermium).

See the following resources:

http://www.wsu.edu/~collins/Phys415/writeups/Moseley.htm

http://dental.senzoku.showa-u.ac.jp/dent/radiol/Prometheus/Storm&Israel_1970/S&I_Tables_II-VIII/S&I_Table_III.html

http://online.nucleartraining.co.uk/resources/xrayenergies.htm
http://online.nucleartraining.co.uk/resources/index.htm (more resources, links to downloads and other sites)

Gamma-rays originate from the nucleus of atoms upon the absorption of a neutron (n, \gamma) reaction, in decay of many radionuclides following beta decay, and from the decay of some subatomic particles.

The lowest energy gamma (from Er-169) has an energy of 8 kev (0.008 MeV). About 58 radionuclides have gamma-energies in the X-ray region (8-145 keV).

For some information on gamma-rays (sources, energies, yields) of selected radionuclides - see http://ie.lbl.gov/toipdf/eandi.pdf

Gamma-rays from neutron capture.

Tables of http://www-nds.iaea.org/wallet/tnc/ngtblcontentbyn.shtml

Tables of http://www-nds.iaea.org/wallet/tnc/ngtblcontentbye.shtml
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Astronuc said:
Gamma-rays originate from the nucleus of atoms upon the absorption of a neutron (n, \gamma) reaction, in decay of many radionuclides following beta decay, and from the decay of some subatomic particles.

Yes - I would only add that gamma rays have characteristic wavelengths
too. Just as there are K and L shells [ quantized energy states ] for the
electrons surrounding atoms - the energy levels of the nucleons [ protons
and neutrons ] in the nucleus of an atom are also quantized. The gamma
rays are the result of a nucleon transitioning between these levels.
[However, because the strong nuclear force which binds nucleons is so
much stronger than the Coulomb force which binds electrons to atoms,
the energies of gamma rays are much greater than the energies of
X-rays].

Because of this - the gamma ray spectrum is indicative of the radioisotope
that emitted it. This allows us to identify materials based on their
emitted radiation signature.

This effect is being put to good use in portable radiation analyzers:

http://www.llnl.gov/ipac/technology/profile/radscout/

http://www.ortec-online.com/psis.htm

Dr. Gregory Greenman
Physicist
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"... because the strong nuclear force which binds nucleons is so
much stronger than the Coulomb force which binds electrons to atoms,
the energies of gamma rays are much greater than the energies of
X-rays]."

I beg to differ slightly: Similarly to the atomic shell model the nuclear admits of low energy transitions at the "top". A rather famous example is the Fe 14.4 keV Moessbauer line.

bc
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top