Insanely vague thermodynamics question

[freemind]

I'm seriously struggling with the following question:

Ideal gas is in the container with a piston as one of the walls. In another wall of the container, there is a little hole, through which gas leaks out of the container. As a result of both heating and compressing the gas, its temperature increases 4 times, and pressure increases 8 times. How does the rate of the gas outflow through the hole change?


Is there enough information here to solve the problem? I'm thinking no. However, I'm not asking for this problem to be solved. I just need to know if it can be solved with the given information, and any ideas on how I may approach this.

Thanks

 

[vincentchan]

no way you can solve this problem by the information given above

 

[Q_Goest]

Yes, you can do it. It is in principal calculable. By applying the first law, you can model all of the phenomena which occur inside this container. Remember the change in internal energy of the gas inside the container equals the sum of (where I'll leave it to the reader to determine sign of the variable) equals the sum of the enthalpy coming in, plus the enthalpy leaving, plus the work coming in, plus the work going out, plus the heat going in, plus the heat going out.

You can assume there is no heat transfer, and no gas coming in. You are left with the work and enthalpy leaving equal to the internal energy change of the gas inside the container.

 

[vincentchan]

yes, you can do it. ( if you figure out how to solve an 1 equation, 3 unknown problem...)

 

[Q_Goest]

Good point... there are 2 ways to do it.
1) You model it on a computer. You have work in, enthalpy out. Take a guess at both. Does the guess you provided end up with ...

its temperature increases 4 times, and pressure increases 8 times.

iterate...

2) You can create two equations such that:
version 1 has
1T (temp)
1P (pressure)

version 2 has
4T (temp)
8P (pressure)

Now you have two unknowns and two equations. The unknowns are T and P.

 

[vincentchan]

you still don't get the question, the unknowns are 1) heat goes in, 2) volume decrease, 3) the time which the action taken place, 4) the original volume, and finally, 5) the gas out flow rate.

the first four are independent variables and can't be derive from the information given by the question.

 

[Q_Goest]

vincent. you're wrong. keep thinking about it.

 

[vincentchan]

Q goest, if you are right, why don't you show me the answer...

 

[freemind]

Allright, here's what I did:

Since we must find the rate of change of the rate of gas outflow, we must first derive an expression for the amount of gas in the cylinder in terms of the pressure, volume and temperature. Hence:

N(t) = \frac{p(t)V(t)}{kT(t)} where p(t) = 8t , T(t) = 4t.

This reduces to N(t) = {\frac {2 V \left( t \right) }{k}}

Thus the general solution is \frac{2}{k}{\frac {d^{2}V(t)}{d{t}^{2}}.


Where have I gone wrong? (if at all)


PS: Q_Goest, I firmly believe that computer modelling is not needed for this question, considering the fact that it appeared on a physics contest preparation paper.

 

[vincentchan]

First of all, the question didn't state the temperature and presure increase LINEARLY, so, P(t) is not equal to 8Pt and T(t) is not 4Tt. The question is saying the FINAL TEMPERATURE and FINAL PRESURE is increased by 4 & 8 times. P(t) and T(t) is depend on the heat flows in and volume decrease, which may or may not be constant. Also the outfow rate is not a constant because the tempeture and presure and density of gas inside the box keep changing.. Secondly, you didn't say you know the original volume, temperature and presure of the box.

 

[freemind]

darn, vincentchan you do have valid points there. I have tried looking at the enthalpy of the system and the energy equations, but I still can't connect the dots.

 

[vincentchan]

As I told you at the very begining, unless you moldify your question, this question has no solution...

 

[apchemstudent]

I'm seriously struggling with the following question:

Ideal gas is in the container with a piston as one of the walls. In another wall of the container, there is a little hole, through which gas leaks out of the container. As a result of both heating and compressing the gas, its temperature increases 4 times, and pressure increases 8 times. How does the rate of the gas outflow through the hole change?


Is there enough information here to solve the problem? I'm thinking no. However, I'm not asking for this problem to be solved. I just need to know if it can be solved with the given information, and any ideas on how I may approach this.

Thanks

I agree with vincentchan... but if we assumed the number of moles leaked out of the tiny hole is insignificant, we might be able to solve this using Grahm's law of Gas effusion.

When uncompressed, and regular temperature...
PV = (2*nKE)/3

v = root of 3RT/m

After compressed and temperature goes up
V = nR*4T/(8*P)

8P * nR*4T/(8*P) = 2/3 * 1/2 * mvo^2

vo = root of 12RT/m

According to Grahm's law of Gas effusion the rates are proportional to their average speed of the gas particles:

ro/r = root of (12RT/3RT) <---------- masses cancel...

so ro = 2 times faster then the initial rate... That's all i can say about this...

 

[freemind]

apchemstudent, your calculations seem correct, but as you stated, they depend on the assumption of gas effusion. The question asks for 'how the rate of gas outflow changes' (essentially a double derivative is involved here), so I'm thinking that there is always a non-zero gas outflow. Ah well. I'll just write down "The rate of gas outflow increases."

Tks to everyone who posted, for all the help.

 

[Cyrus]

Here is just a stab at it, but I am probably wrong:

We know that

Pv_1=n_1RT (at initial conditions.)

and that:

8Pv_2 = n_2R4T (at final conditions.)
or:
2Pv_2=n_2RT

If we subtract these two states:

2Pv_2 -pv_1 = n_2RT-n_1RT
or:
2P(v_2-v_1)=RT(n_2 - n_1)
but if we divide by the amount of time t,
\frac {2P(v_2-v_1)}{t} = \frac {RT(n_2 - n_1)}{t}
and take the limit of the amount of change to be very small, and the time to be very small, it becomes a derivative and we get that:

\frac {2P dv}{dt}= \frac {RT dn}{dt}
which is equal to:

\frac {2P dv}{RT dt} = \frac{dn}{dt}

which means that the amount of change that leakes through any sized hole is proportional to the change in volume times some constant, which is 2P/RT.

But its just a guess. Hope it might help. Oh, I assumed that the pressure and temperature changed Linearly with time so the cancelation was possible, but like vincentchan said, this may not be true. (lets cross our fingers that it is )

 

[Gokul43201]

The only assumption to be made is that, since the hole is said to be "small" compared to area of the wall, the total number of molecules in the container before and after the change of pressure/temp is the same.

Imagine a small portion of the container wall, area = A. In some short time \Delta t let's calculate how many molecules hit the wall. If the mean velocity of the molecules in the +x direction is &lt;v_x&gt;, then all the molecules contained within a volume adjacent to this wall, of depth &lt;v_x&gt; \Delta t will hit the wall. This number is simply the product of this volume with the number density of the molecules, n. So,

\Delta N = nA &lt;v_x&gt; \Delta t

But from the Ideal Gas Law, there's

P = nkT =&gt; n = P/kT

And the average molecular speed is simply

&lt;v_x&gt; = \int _0 ^{\infty} v_xf(v_x)dv_x

where f(v) is the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution function, given by

f(v_x) = [ m/2 \pi kT]^{3/2} e^{-mv_x^2/2kT}

Solving the integral gives the well known result (and you can probably use the result without having to derive it)

&lt;v_x&gt; = \sqrt{\frac{8kT}{\pi m}}

So substituting for n, <v> into the first equation gives

\frac{\Delta N}{\Delta t} = \frac{PA}{kT} \sqrt{\frac{8kT}{\pi m}} ~~ \alpha ~~ \frac{P}{\sqrt{T}}

So this is a measure of the rate of collision against the wall. Clearly if this small portion of the wall were removed (creating a small opening), the above number will give you a measure of the rate of escape, or the leak rate.

So, if the P--->8P, T---> 4T, the leak rate will increase by a factor of 8/ \sqrt{4} or 4 times.

 

[Q_Goest]

Gokul, it looks as if you're trying to calculate the mass flow out of the cylinder by calculating the number of molecules which will collide with the given orifice area. Although I really am impressed by that method, it's not very accurate. For example, the pressure inside and outside might be equal, such that there are equal numbers of molecules going into the cylinder as there are going out. As internal pressure increases, more go out than in. To calculate the flow rate out, one uses orifice equations. Would you like those?

I'm not absolutely sure the below is correct, I haven't gone through the numbers, but I believe it should work, if not then some minor adjustments may be required. Also, I'm not going into the integration which should provide a more accurate answer, this is a strictly algebraic solution. Note that iterating as I explain below will give you the integrated answer. Given the amount of time I'm spending here, I'd rather not resolve the entire problem, but this should at least provide a start for you, Freemind.

The problem states "As a result of both heating and compressing the gas, ... " which implies the piston is compressing the gas in an undefined way. Also, there is no mention of heat flux, so I assume the "heating" they are referring to is the heating due to work being done on the gas.

This is a first law calculation, I'll use energy leaving the system as negative, and energy going into the system as positive.

U-U1 = Wi - Ho

Where U1 = initial internal energy
U2 = final internal energy
Wi = Work going into the system performed by the piston
Ho = Enthalpy out

Note there is no work done by the system, so no Wo (work out). There is no mass coming in, so no Hi. And no heat transfer so Qi and Qo are zero.

Now U = m*cv*T
where m = mass
cv = Specific heat at constant volume
T = temperature

H = m*cp*T
where m = mass
cp = Specific heat at constant pressure
T = temperature

W = P*A*s
Where P = pressure
A = area
s = distance piston moves through

so we combine these and obtain:

m2*cv*T2 - m1*cv*T1 = P(avg)*A*s - mo*cp*T(avg)

Here I'm going to make the assumption the change in pressure and temp are linear, which is not exact. That's one reason modeling this would provide a more accurate description (ie: integrating or iterating using a computer model). Since mass flow rate out changes as pressure and temperature changes, we can make iterations with small changes in pressure and temperature such that the errors on any iteration are small. If iterating, these equations are used and the pressure and temperature are the pressure and temperature at the beginning and end of each iteration. Note also that if iterating, the mass flow rate out is calculated with each iteration. I haven't provided the mass flow equations for the orifice, and if you really want them I'll provide.

We also use the following:
m1 - m2 = mo
Where m1 = the mass in the cylinder at the beginning of each step
m2 = the mass in the cylinder at the end of each step
mo = mass leaving the cylinder, calculated by orifice flow equations

T2 = 4*T1 (or 4T1)
P2 = 8*P1 (or 8P1)

Now these are put into the equation above

(m1-mo)*cv*4T1 - m1*cv*T1 = ((P1+8P1)/2)*A*s - mo*cp*((T1+4T1)/2)

Use ideal gas law to give the initial conditions of pressure and temperature (ie: P1, T1)

You can now determine the equation for the mass out as a function of distance through which the piston moves.

mo(s) which will result in a 4T and 8P rise.

Note: This doesn't guarantee a given gas can give you the given rise in pressure and temperature, there may be no solution for some gasses. This simply gives you the basics of how to go about calculating the answer if in fact it's possible.

 

[Andrew Mason]

I'm seriously struggling with the following question:

Ideal gas is in the container with a piston as one of the walls. In another wall of the container, there is a little hole, through which gas leaks out of the container. As a result of both heating and compressing the gas, its temperature increases 4 times, and pressure increases 8 times. How does the rate of the gas outflow through the hole change?

I would say that this is a mechanical energy question, not a thermodynamic one. It doesn't matter why the pressure increases.

The rate of gas outflow is dm/dt where dm = \rho dV

Think of pressure as an energy density (energy/unit volume):
P = \frac{dE}{dV}

In order to accelerate an element dm = \rho dV of gas to speed v, you need an amount of energy:

dE = \frac{1}{2}dmv^2

where dm = \rho dV So in terms of energy density or pressure:

(1) \frac{dE}{dV} = \frac{1}{2}\rho v^2 = P

Now, the density of the gas is a function of its mass and volume, but you don't have to know that because the hole is small so the mass does not change rapidly. So:

v \propto \sqrt{P}

Since dm/dt = \rho dV/dt = \rho Adl/dt = \rho A v, this means that: dm/dt \propto vA \propto A \sqrt{P}]

So the rate of gas outflow increases by \sqrt{8} = 2.83


Correction: This would be correct if the volume did not change. I forgot that the increase in pressure was due to compression as well as adding heat. So there is a thermodynamic aspect here.

\rho = m/V so \rho = mP/nRT \propto P/T since PV = nRT

so from (1)

\frac{1}{2}\rho v^2 = P

Therefore:

v^2 \propto P/\rho \propto P/(P/T) \propto T !

[Further Correction: Since dm/dt \propto \rho v \propto P\sqrt{T}/T = P/\sqrt{T} ]

So the rate of gas outflow increases by 8/\sqrt{4} = 4

So Gokul4321 was right!

AM

 

[vincentchan]

Since this questoin is come from a high school physics contest, I WILL MAKE IT SIMPLE (use the assumtion you guys made, the hole is small...)

Frist, compress the box into half of its original volume thru an isothermal process (without changing its temperature)
P_{a} = 2P_{i}
T_{a} = T_{i}
V_{a} = 1/2V_{i}
and most important \rho_{f} = 2\rho_{i}

Then, increase the temperature of the box by 4 times(Fixed the volume). Using
PV = nRT n is constant since the hole is small, We have
P_{f} = 4P_{a} = 8P_{i}
T_{f} = 4T_{a} = 4T_{i}
V_{f} = V_{a} = 1/2V_{i}
\rho_{f} = \rho_{a} = 2\rho_{i}
again
v \alpha \sqrt{P} however, the density has double
the final outflow rate = 2*\sqrt{8} initial outflow rate
= 4*\sqrt{2} initial outflow rate

The spirit of a homework helper is not posting out the answer, but you guys made this question too complicate and the answer is the only way to clarify everything...sorry

 

[apchemstudent]

Since this questoin is come from a high school physics contest, I WILL MAKE IT SIMPLE (use the assumtion you guys made, the hole is small...)

Frist, compress the box into half of its original volume thru an isothermal process (without changing its temperature)
P_{a} = 2P_{i}
T_{a} = T_{i}
V_{a} = 1/2V_{i}
and most important \rho_{f} = 2\rho_{i}

Then, increase the temperature of the box by 4 times(Fixed the volume). Using
PV = nRT n is constant since the hole is small, We have
P_{f} = 4P_{a} = 8P_{i}
T_{f} = 4T_{a} = 4T_{i}
V_{f} = V_{a} = 1/2V_{i}
\rho_{f} = \rho_{a} = 2\rho_{i}
again
v \alpha \sqrt{P} however, the density has double
the final outflow rate = 2*\sqrt{8} initial outflow rate
= 4*\sqrt{2} initial outflow rate

The spirit of a homework helper is not posting out the answer, but you guys made this question too complicate and the answer is the only way to clarify everything...sorry

where does density*root Pressure come from? Can you really say that density is directly proportional to flow rate? I mean, if the gas is thicker, shouldn't it be harder for it to go out not easier...

If we're saying that the density does not change, just when it enters the hole ( what vincentchan is assuming)... then:

v is proportional to sqrt(P/density) = sqrt(8/2) = 2 times initial flow rate...

 

[Gokul43201]

Gokul, it looks as if you're trying to calculate the mass flow out of the cylinder by calculating the number of molecules which will collide with the given orifice area. Although I really am impressed by that method, it's not very accurate. For example, the pressure inside and outside might be equal, such that there are equal numbers of molecules going into the cylinder as there are going out. As internal pressure increases, more go out than in.

True. Still, I think my approach works if either (i) P is a gauge pressure, or (ii) P is large compared to 1 atm.

Having said this, I'm going to - when I next go to lab - find our copy of Roth (Vacuum Technology) and look up the formula for flow out of a small circular orifice.

Anyway, what I find interesting is that we seem to have - amongst the lot of us - come up with nearly every number from 2 to sqrt(32) as possible answers.

 

[vincentchan]

the outflow rate is not only related to its velocity, but also its density. Imagine there are 2 freeways, the speed limit are both 65 mph. One has double the cars compare with the other. Which one has more cars pass through per unit hour?
Hope this answer your question

 

[freemind]

Originally posted by vincentchan
Frist, compress the box into half of its original volume thru an isothermal process (without changing its temperature)
P_{a} = 2P_{i}
T_{a} = T_{i}
V_{a} = 1/2V_{i}
and most important \rho_{f} = 2\rho_{i}. Reload this page in a moment.

vincentchan, this is based on the assumption that the volume decreases to half of its original value. However, this is not stated in the question. The volume reduction could be 5 times, 8 times or even 500 times the initial. The final answer (directly or indirectly) should not depend upon the volume at any given time. Variables will definitely cancel out, V being one of them.

Anyway, I quite like Mr. Mason's solution to the problem. Its logical and simple enough to be a likely solution to a high-school physics contest preparation question. Nevertheless, I'm not aversed to using a little bit of Calculus (referring of course to Gokul43201's Maxwellian distribution :) ). Once again, tks for all the help.

This problem is due on 10/01/05, which means I'll probably receive the solution somewhere around 13/01/05, upon which I'll immediately post it here.

 

[Gokul43201]

Oops...I didn't know the contest was still open. I thought this was a question from some previous contest that you are using as preparatory material.

 

[freemind]

Actually the question itself is not from a contest. Its just one of the many challenging questions on an International Physics Olympiad (IPhO) preparation paper written by the University of Toronto.

 

[vincentchan]

Based on the formulas
PV=nRT
if n is unchanged, no matter how you add heat in and/or compress the system, the V_{f} is known since we have initial and final P,T

 

[vincentchan]

The reason I compress the air first and increase temperature later is just try to make it easier for ppl to understand...

 

[freemind]

vincentchan, you're right about the final volume being determined by PV = nRT. I stupidly overlooked that. However, assuming that n is unchanging during compression/heating automatically makes the initial gas outflow rate 0 (which is a little disconcerting, if you ask me).

If I'm not mistaken, the equation for \Delta E_{int} is in fact path dependent, since the process is neither adiabatic, nor cyclical, nor free-expansive.

 

[vincentchan]

you can assume dn/dt is not zero but it is too small to affect the total gas in the box

 

[apchemstudent]

I just like to go on what vincentchan was saying how v is proportional to sqrtP

density*v^2 = P

v is proportional to sqrt(P/density)... not density *sqrt P... If anything sqrt(P*density), but that doesn't follow the equation...

As for the analogy of the freeways... I just like to add... Let's say there were 3 lanes and only the middle one is open. The freeway with less cars will be moving faster... not necessarily the mass flow rate... but the speed of the particle is what we're trying to get at...

 

[vincentchan]

yes, you are right, v \alpha \sqrt{P/\rho}
so the answer is \sqrt{P\rho} = \sqrt{16} = 4

 

[apchemstudent]

yes, you are right, v \alpha \sqrt{P/\rho}
so the answer is \sqrt{P\rho} = \sqrt{16} = 4

wut? you just contradicted your self...

sqrt(P/density) does not equal sqrt(P*density)

 

[vincentchan]

but flux = \rho v = \rho \sqrt{P/\rho} = \sqrt{P\rho}

 

[Andrew Mason]

I have submitted a further correction to my answer to account for the fact that dm/dt = \rho v A is it is proportional to v and density. I overlooked the density part. So I would agree with Gokul's answer: 4

AM

 

[Gokul43201]

Aha...do I see semblance of a consensus ?

 

[vincentchan]

Just want to say, even if we use different approach to do this problem, the answers are the same, this is the beauty of Physics, and that is the reason we love it, and spend so much time on it.

 

[apchemstudent]

Ya i agree with 4 too... In my previous posts with Grahm's law i got v = 2v(initial)

so 2density(initial) * 2v(initial) * A = 4 times initial flow rate...

 

[Gokul43201]

Yes, the Grahm's Law approach will work only if you also account for the change in density.

 

[Andrew Mason]

Just want to say, even if we use different approach to do this problem, the answers are the same, this is the beauty of Physics, and that is the reason we love it, and spend so much time on it.

Yes. A very good point. Looking at a problem in different ways like this is a great way to not only learn but to think of new ways of asking questions. One of my favourite quotes of Feynman is from his 1965 Nobel lecture which fits very nicely with your comment:

"I would like to interrupt here to make a remark. The fact that electrodynamics can be written in so many ways - the differential equations of Maxwell, various minimum principles with fields, minimum principles without fields, all different kinds of ways, was something I knew, but I have never understood. It always seems odd to me that the fundamental laws of physics, when discovered, can appear in so many different forms that are not apparently identical at first, but, with a little mathematical fiddling you can show the relationship. An example of that is the Schrödinger equation and the Heisenberg formulation of quantum mechanics. I don't know why this is - it remains a mystery, but it was something I learned from experience. There is always another way to say the same thing that doesn't look at all like the way you said it before. I don't know what the reason for this is. I think it is somehow a representation of the simplicity of nature. A thing like the inverse square law is just right to be represented by the solution of Poisson's equation, which, therefore, is a very different way to say the same thing that doesn't look at all like the way you said it before. I don't know what it means, that nature chooses these curious forms, but maybe that is a way of defining simplicity. Perhaps a thing is simple if you can describe it fully in several different ways without immediately knowing that you are describing the same thing."

There is nothing better than trying to solve challenging problems with different approaches (and risk making mistakes, which everyone does). Nothing should be more encouraged, particular for the many bright young minds around here. I have quite enjoyed this little problem and I think I have learned a little more about thermodynamics.

AM

 

[freemind]

Well, I finally got the actual solution and sure enough, the answer was in fact 4. Unfortunately, I can't find the time to rewrite the entire solution in LaTeX and site bandwidth limitations render any attempt at a png/jpeg solution useless (the original solution was in a pdf). Once again, thanks to everyone who posted.

 

[dextercioby]

The only assumption to be made is that, since the hole is said to be "small" compared to area of the wall, the total number of molecules in the container before and after the change of pressure/temp is the same.

Imagine a small portion of the container wall, area = A. In some short time \Delta t let's calculate how many molecules hit the wall. If the mean velocity of the molecules in the +x direction is &lt;v_x&gt;, then all the molecules contained within a volume adjacent to this wall, of depth &lt;v_x&gt; \Delta t will hit the wall. This number is simply the product of this volume with the number density of the molecules, n. So,

\Delta N = nA &lt;v_x&gt; \Delta t

But from the Ideal Gas Law, there's

P = nkT =&gt; n = P/kT

And the average molecular speed is simply

&lt;v_x&gt; = \int _0 ^{\infty} v_xf(v_x)dv_x

where f(v) is the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution function, given by

f(v_x) = [ m/2 \pi kT]^{3/2} e^{-mv_x^2/2kT}

Solving the integral gives the well known result (and you can probably use the result without having to derive it)

&lt;v_x&gt; = \sqrt{\frac{8kT}{\pi m}}

So substituting for n, <v> into the first equation gives

\frac{\Delta N}{\Delta t} = \frac{PA}{kT} \sqrt{\frac{8kT}{\pi m}} ~~ \alpha ~~ \frac{P}{\sqrt{T}}

So this is a measure of the rate of collision against the wall. Clearly if this small portion of the wall were removed (creating a small opening), the above number will give you a measure of the rate of escape, or the leak rate.

So, if the P--->8P, T---> 4T, the leak rate will increase by a factor of 8/ \sqrt{4} or 4 times.

Well,my friend,i have news for you:bad and good.The bad news is that ur approach is wrong.The good news is,that it yields the correct number (i.e.4),gotten from a wrong formula.

I invite you and the other reading this thread to go to the closest library and search pages 174 pp.177 from:
Greiner,Neise,Stoecker:"Thermodynamics and statistical mechanics",Springer Verlag,1997 for the correct approach.

Just in case one ot the interested parties is lazy (or just cannot find the books and not not even another book to get it),i'll post the final formula:
\frac{d^{2}N}{dSdt} =\frac{p}{kT}\sqrt{\frac{kT}{2\pi m}}

There's one more thing,and for this one i didn't need the book,just my memoir... Do you see something peculiar here:

f(v_x) = [ m/2 \pi kT]^{3/2} e^{-mv_x^2/2kT}

If u do,it's not from that number,it's from the very beginning...
With that expression (the previous one) u don't get the (incidentally wrong) value u've posted:
&lt;v_x&gt; = \sqrt{\frac{8kT}{\pi m}}(?)

I resent your notation,however.You know the last "animal" is always zero at equilibrium.However,in your (misleading) notation is not.But it's still not the formula you posted.

Daniel.


PS.Gokul,you know i did it for the sake of correctness.After all,it's still a science forum...

 

[Gokul43201]

Dexter, I don't understand exactly what you're saying ...but I'll try and fix the ugliness in my post.

\Delta N ~~\alpha ~~ nA &lt;|\vec{v}|&gt; \Delta t

But from the Ideal Gas Law, there's

P = nkT =&gt; n = P/kT

And the average molecular speed is

&lt;|\vec{v}|&gt; = \int _0 ^{\infty} vf(|\vec{v}|)dv

where f(|\vec{v}|) is the speed distribution, given by

f(|\vec{v}|) = 4\pi v^2 f(\vec{v}) = 4\pi v^2 [ m/2 \pi kT]^{3/2} e^{-mv^2/2kT}

Solving the integral gives the mean molecular speed (and you can probably use the result without having to derive it)

&lt;|\vec{v}|&gt; = \sqrt{\frac{8kT}{\pi m}}

So substituting for n, <|v|> into the first equation gives

\frac{\Delta N}{\Delta t} ~~\alpha ~~ \frac{PA}{kT} \sqrt{\frac{8kT}{\pi m}} ~~ \alpha ~~ \frac{P}{\sqrt{T}}

So, if the P--->8P, T---> 4T, the leak rate will increase by a factor of 8/ \sqrt{4} or 4 times.

Is this better, or are you talking about something else that I'm completely missing ?

 

[dextercioby]

1.Do you really want me to copy 3 pages from a book just to prove my point??Say so,and i'll do it...This morning I'm free...
2.Now that u've "brushed" it,it looks "sound",though,i'm afraid,still incorrect.So there aren't any objections to be made,except starting with the first formula,which is completely unappropriate for this specific problem.

To the OP:this is not HS problem,even if it's for the International Physics Olympiad.In high-school,on normal basis,one does not study Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics,classical canonical ensemble and certainly not the Gamma Euler function.

Daniel.