What Is the Formula for Calculating Instantaneous Acceleration?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating instantaneous acceleration for a model rocket problem, where the average acceleration is found to be 8 m/s² using the formula a = (v_final - v_initial) / (t_final - t_initial). For instantaneous acceleration at t=1.5s, participants suggest using discrete data points to approximate the value, noting that calculus would provide a more precise method through differentiation. The confusion arises from the need to interpolate additional points and the difference between left-right and right-left delta calculations. Ultimately, the answer key suggests an instantaneous acceleration of about 12 m/s², prompting further questions about the methodology used to arrive at that figure. Understanding calculus is highlighted as beneficial for solving physics problems more accurately.
AznBoi
Messages
470
Reaction score
0
Instantaneous Acceleration Help PLEASE!~~~

I have a homework problem on Instantaneous acceleration:

The engine of a model rocket accelerates the rocket vertically upward for 2seconds as follows: At t=0, speed=0; At t=1s, s=5m/s; At t=2s, s=16m/s.

a) find the average acceleration during the 2s interval and
b) find the instantaneous acceleration at t=1.5s

My work so far:

a) avg acceleration:

a=v/t , (16m/s -0m/s)/(2s-0s)
= (16m/s)/2s

a=8m/s^2 Is that right??

b) I need help on this one:

What is the easiest and simplest way to find the instantaneous accerlation? What is the simplest equation?


I found an equation on a site but I don't understand what the variables mean and what numbers I have to put in.

Equation?: a= lim t->0 (delta)v/(delta)t

On site: http://rockpile.phys.virginia.edu/arch2.pdf#search="instantaneous acceleration"

Don't understand what it means and what numbers I have to subsitute!

BTW THANKS A LOT! =D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
In your previous thread, you mentioned that this is from pre-calc physics, so I'll have to make some assumptions here. If you had calculus as part of this class, you would fit a smooth curve to the 3 data points, and differentiate that curve to get the instantaneous acceleration. Then use an integration to get the average of the instantaneous acceleration.

But since this is pre-calc, I'll assume that you are only supposed to use the discrete data points (this may be wrong, however -- maybe you're supposed to interpolate a few extra points for example). So the average acceleration is the average of the 3 data points you are given (not just the first and last).

To find the discrete instantaneous acceleration, you would take a difference between adjacent velocity data points, and divide by the time difference. Part of the problem with being given so little data, is that you don't know whether to take the left-right delta or the right-left delta. I'd use the right-left delta here, since the acceleration at 0 is probably the least. So I'd get something like:

t=0 -- accel = 0
t=1 -- accel = 5-0 = 5m/s^2
t=2 -- accel = 16-5 = 11m/s^2

Then the average acceleration would be the average of those 3 values of instantaneous acceleration. Since this is a discrete calculation, it is only an approximation of the real average acceleration. In fact, you can bound the average acceleration between the left-right and right-left discrete calculations. Do you see how you would do that?


EDIT -- fixed a typo...16-5=11, not 9. Doh!
 
So you subtract the speeds of two points?? Is learning calculus more beneficial when it comes to Physics?? You can solve problems in physics without calculus right? with equations?

So 16-5= 11m/s^2 is that an exact number?

The answer is about 12m/s^2 on the answer key. I just don't know how they got that.
Isn't there an equation using:

dv/dt or something??


Thanks.
 
AznBoi said:
Is learning calculus more beneficial when it comes to Physics?? You can solve problems in physics without calculus right? with equations?

Here's a recent thread discussing calculus & physics:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=130461

AznBoi said:
So 16-5= 11m/s^2 is that an exact number?

The answer is about 12m/s^2 on the answer key. I just don't know how they got that.
Isn't there an equation using:

dv/dt or something??

Well, interpolating two extra points at 0.5s and 1.5s, and taking the lower bound sum and upper bound sum, I get between 4.5m/s^2 and 8.5m/s^2. So the book must be doing the simple discrete calculation, with the max right-left deltas. They are averaging 5 and 16 over 2s, and getting 21/2 m/s^2 ?


EDIT -- this is a weird problem. I don't think I'll be able to be of much more help. You may just have to wait for class to get clarification. Or maybe another homework helper will stop by and see through the confusion. Good luck!
 
Ok thanks anyways. :smile:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top