Instantaneous doubling of the Infinite Square Well Width

carrlr
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle of mass m is moving in an infinite square well of width a. It has the following normalised energy eigenfunctions:

$$u_n (x) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}} sin(\frac{n \pi x}{a})$$ (1)

a) Give an expression that relates two orthogonal eigenfunctions to each other and use it to show that the eigenfunctions un(x) defined above are orthogonal.

b) Suppose the particle is in the ground state when the width of the potential is doubled such that the well now extends from x = 0 to x = 2a. Write down the eigenfunctions for the new well.

c) Suppose that we make a measurement of the energy of the particle immediately after the well is extended. The expansion postulate of quantum mechanics can be used to make a prediction regarding the outcome of this measurement. Define the terms ψ(x) and
11px-Greek_phi_Didot.svg.png
n(x) in the equation, giving specific reference to the eigenfunctions defined in your answer to part (b), and also to Eq (1), as appropriate. Write down a general equation for calculating the coefficients an.

d) Calculate the probability that this measurement will determine the particle to be in the first excited state (n = 2)

Homework Equations


[/B]
Expansion postulate:

$$ \psi (x) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n \phi _n (x)$$

The Attempt at a Solution



For part a), I know the equation for orthogonality is

$$\int \phi _n*\phi _m d\tau = 0$$

For n≠m.

So I simply put the eigenfunction defined in (1) into this for n and m and showed for all values of n and m that it equals zero.

b) Here, I have just substituted 'a' for '2a' in eq. (1)?

c) I know that ψ is obviously the wave function, and
11px-Greek_phi_Didot.svg.png
the eigenfunction.. where a set of eigenfunctions can form the 'complete set'? As all eigenfunctions of a Hermitian operator form a complete set... The weighting coefficients can be determined by:

$$a_n = \int \phi _n*\ \psi\ d\tau $$

Provided that
11px-Greek_phi_Didot.svg.png
n(x) are orthonormal.

But I'm not sure how to link this to my answer for b) and equation 1.

d) So, I'm led to believe that as the well expands 'instantaneously' the wave function remains the same as before, and 0 between x=0 and x=2a. How do I link this with the 'new' eigenfunctions defined in b)? I know I want to find the weighted coefficient a2 as this can give me the probability for the n=2 state.

I tried to find the coefficient using the equation defined in part c) and the two eigenfunction of the well, before and after, and by splitting the integral up between 0-a and a-2a, you can make the integral between a-2a = 0. But this didn't seem to yield anything and is obviously incorrect. I'm struggling to link some physical interpretation here - am I looking for some overlap of wave functions? Why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have all the ingredients you need. You need to write the "old" ground state wavefunction ##\psi(x)=\sqrt{2/a)} \sin(\pi x/a)## as a linear combination of the "new" eigenfunctions ##\phi_n(x)## of the expanded well that you find in part (b). In other words find ##a_n## such that $$\psi(x)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n \phi_n(x).$$ You seem to have an expression for the ##a_n##, so crank out an integral to find the general form for arbitrary n.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top