Instantaneous poynting vector for EM radiation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the instantaneous Poynting vector for electromagnetic (EM) radiation, specifically how it behaves when electric (E) and magnetic (B) fields reach maximum and zero values. The instantaneous Poynting vector is defined as S = (1/u) EB[cos^2(wt - kr)], highlighting its dependence on time and position. Participants clarify that while E and B are in phase in a monochromatic plane wave, energy is not stored but rather transferred with the wave, moving ahead as the fields oscillate. The energy is proportional to the squares of the maximum values of E and B, with each contributing half to the total energy of the wave. Understanding concepts like circular polarization can further clarify the behavior of EM waves and their energy distribution.
WRGmedphys
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Have viewed PF, first time post (have searched for this question on forum):

The energy of EM radiation can be described by the Poynting vector S = E x B (insert conversion factor for cgs, MKS, etc).

For a traveling EM wave, what happens to the instantaneous value of S when E and B are max as compared to when E and B are 0?

Alternatively, how is the energy of the EM radiation shared between E and B with both E and B having maximum and zero values at the same instant of time for a plane wave?

Thank you for your input.

WRG
 
Science news on Phys.org
hi WR;
The eqn. you gave is actually the TIME AVERAGED Poynting vector.
The instantaneous Poynting vector whcih depends upon time and position, r, is given by:

S = (1/u) EB[cos^2(wt -kr)]...where w is the freqency.

Good question.
Creator
 
Last edited:
Thank you for your response Creator. Believe my confusion was considering E and B as sharing the energy of the wave (similar to K.E. and potential sharing the total E). Will dig out my undergraduate intermediate EM book and review more throughly (still confused as to where the energy is stored when E and B are both zero as compared to when E and B are both maximum).

WRG
 
WRGmedphys said:
Thank you for your response Creator. Believe my confusion was considering E and B as sharing the energy of the wave (similar to K.E. and potential sharing the total E).
No problem;
In a (monochromatic) plane wave Maxwell's equations ensure E and B are always in phase, (in vacuum).
The energy is proportional to the square of the MAX. E field OR the square of the MAX. B field, and yes, alternately it can be written as the sum of 1/2 of each field squared (with appropriate epsilon and mu factors) since each "contributes" half the energy of the wave.

(still confused as to where the energy is stored when E and B are both zero as compared to when E and B are both maximum).

The energy is not 'stored' but rather it is moved ...the energy of the waves moves with the wave. At the zero point (minimum phase) we can say the energy has moved ahead. The energy is still "stored" in the E & B field, but the fields have moved position.
Remember Poynting Vector is an energy FLUX, meaning a rate of transfer of energy.

Your worry is a common concern among those who question that the 'in phase' relation of E & B implies violation of conservation of energy.
But the question is mis-placed since even though the instantaneous energy "disappears" AT ONE LOCATION, it "reappears" simultaneously at another location, namely, 1/4 wavelength ahead in the wave (where the fields are at maximum).

Creator
 
Last edited:
Thinking about circular polarization really helps clarify this. Here there are no nodes. Circular polarization is the sum of two linerly polarized waves at right angles in space and 90 degrees apart in time.

Think of a helix instead of a sinewave.
 
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
Back
Top