How Do You Determine Instantaneous Velocity from a Tangent Line?

AI Thread Summary
To determine instantaneous velocity from a tangent line on a position-time graph, one must measure the slope of the tangent line at the specific time of interest, in this case, t = 2.00 seconds. This involves selecting the endpoints of the tangent line and calculating the slope using the formula for slope, which is the change in position (y-axis) divided by the change in time (x-axis). It is important to note that simply picking two points on the curve itself yields average velocity, not instantaneous velocity. The correct approach is to focus solely on the tangent line at the designated time. Understanding that "wrt" means "with respect to" clarifies the terminology used in the calculations.
webren
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hello,
This problem is very simple, but I don't see what I am doing wrong.

"A positive-time graph for a particle moving along the x-axis is shown in Figure P2.7 Determine the instantaneous velocity at t = 2.00 s by measuring the slope of the tangent line shown in the graph."

I understand that without seeing the actual graph, it might be a little annoying, but it's a graph with a parabola with a tangent line.

My immediate reaction was to simply pick two points on the graph, and find the slope. This seems to be incorrect and seems to be the average velocity. To find the instantaneous velocity, the book uses the end points of the tangent line.

How do I go about finding the instantaneous velocity?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Simply take the gradient of the tangent line at t=0. Can be the difference of the ends of the tangent wrt the y-axis divided by the difference of the ends wrt the x axis.
 
wrt? What is that?
 
webren said:
wrt? What is that?
wrt = "with respect to"

Kurdt is right but I think he made a typo, he meant "at t =2 s", not at 0 s.


If you want the instantaneous velocity at t=2 s, you draw a tangent to the x vs t graph at t=2 second and you measure the slope of the tangent line. That's all there is to it!

From what you wrote it seems like they already have drawn the tangent at 2 seconds, in which case just calculate the slope of that line (which will come out in m/s as you will notice)

Patrick
 
webren said:
Hello,
To find the instantaneous velocity, the book uses the end points of the tangent line.

How do I go about finding the instantaneous velocity?

Thank you.

Didn't you answer your own question? Use points of the tangent line to find the slope. This is because the slop of the tangent line at a point to any funtion is the instantaneous change in that function, if the initial funtion represents position then the slope of the tangent line at any point will represent instantaneous velocity.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top