Integral of heaviside, why multiply the result with a heavside function again?

kougou
Messages
80
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




∫(H(t-2)t)dt from t=0 to t.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



It's same as ∫t=2 t (t-2)dt, which is
t^2/2-2t+2.

But do we have to multiply the answer with H(t-2)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's probably more for practice than anything else. You are correct that when you have a simple case like this, it's easy to look at it as a piecewise function and break the integral into the relevant pieces. That said, if you have a more complicated situation, it will be much easier to evaluate it as (I assume your textbook/teacher) says, without eliminating the unit step functions.
 
kougou said:

Homework Statement




∫(H(t-2)t)dt from t=0 to t.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



It's same as ∫t=2 t (t-2)dt, which is
t^2/2-2t+2.

No, it isn't the same as that.

First of all, in order to not confuse the dummy variable inside the integral with the t in the limits you should write the problem like this:$$
\int_0^t sH(s-2)\, ds$$Then think about where ##H(s-2) = 1## or ##H(s-2)=0## when working the integral.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top