Integral (related to Laplace transform)

Pzi
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hi.

Homework Statement


\int\limits_0^{ + \infty } {\frac{{dt}}{{{e^{st}} \cdot (1 + {e^t})}}}

Homework Equations


The same as...
Laplace\left[ {\frac{1}{{1 + {e^t}}}} \right]

The Attempt at a Solution


Found no elegant properties related to Laplace transform here.
So figured my best shot would be to integrate directly...

Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pzi said:
Hi.

Homework Statement


\int\limits_0^{ + \infty } {\frac{{dt}}{{{e^{st}} \cdot (1 + {e^t})}}}

Homework Equations


The same as...
Laplace\left[ {\frac{1}{{1 + {e^t}}}} \right]

The Attempt at a Solution


Found no elegant properties related to Laplace transform here.
So figured my best shot would be to integrate directly...

Any suggestions?

I think it is a non-elementary integral. By changing variables to u = exp(t), and recognizing that for s > 0 we have exp(-s*t) = exp(-s*ln(u)) = u^(-s), the integral becomes
J = \int_1^{\infty} \frac{ u^{-s-1}}{1+u} \, du, which Maple 11 evaluates as
J = -\text{LerchPhi}(-1,1,-s) - \pi \csc(\pi s),
where LerchPhi is the function defined as
\text{LerchPhi}(z,a,v) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{z^n}{(v+n)^a} if |z| < 1 or |z|=1 and \text{Re}(a) > 1. It is extended to the whole complex z-plane by analytic continuation.

RGV
 
Ray Vickson said:
I think it is a non-elementary integral. By changing variables to u = exp(t), and recognizing that for s > 0 we have exp(-s*t) = exp(-s*ln(u)) = u^(-s), the integral becomes
J = \int_1^{\infty} \frac{ u^{-s-1}}{1+u} \, du, which Maple 11 evaluates as
J = -\text{LerchPhi}(-1,1,-s) - \pi \csc(\pi s),
where LerchPhi is the function defined as
\text{LerchPhi}(z,a,v) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{z^n}{(v+n)^a} if |z| < 1 or |z|=1 and \text{Re}(a) > 1. It is extended to the whole complex z-plane by analytic continuation.
RGV
Yea, looks like it's indeed a non-elementary case here...
As this is a part of some differential equations I will work around it (using convolution), but it will be ugly.

Thanks for clarification!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top