Integrating Definite Integral of (x - x^2)*(2x^(-1/3)) from -8 to -1

  • Thread starter Thread starter VikingStorm
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the integration of the function (x - x^2)*(2x^(-1/3)) from -8 to -1. Participants identify errors in the original equation's formatting, particularly regarding the placement of the constant 2 in the denominator. The calculations reveal discrepancies in the final results, with one participant obtaining 57.112 while others point out mistakes in exponent handling and multiplication. The importance of careful notation and arithmetic in integration is emphasized, as participants express concern over making similar errors on tests. Overall, the thread highlights common pitfalls in calculus integration and the need for precision in mathematical expressions.
VikingStorm
INT[-8 to -1] x - x^2 / 2*x^(1/3) dx

(x - x^2)*(2x^(-1/3))

Distributed:
2x^(2/3) - 2x^(5/3)

[6x^(5/3) / 5] -[ 3x^(8/3) / 4]

Plug in -1, and -8

-1.2 - -.75 = -.45

-38.4 - - 192 = 153.6

-.45 - 153.6 = -154.05

When I put this into the calculator straight to check my work, I get 57.112 as the answer. What did I do wrong here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by VikingStorm
x - x^2 / 2*x^(1/3) dx

(x - x^2)*(2x^(-1/3))

There is the error. In your original equation, the 2 is in the denominator. In your second equation, you brought the 2 to the top without putting a negative exponent on it; you only put a negative exponent on the x.
 
<br /> \frac{x-x^2}{2x^{1/3}}<br /> = (x-x^2) (\frac{1}{2} x^{-1/3})<br />

<br /> (-1)^{8/3} = 1<br />
 
Ah, I thought it was just a constant multiplier that stuck with the x.

Hmm...

So that would make it:
[ 2^-1 * x^(2/3)] - [2^-1 * x^(5/3)]

5x^(5/3)/6 - 3x^(8/3)/16

For -8, I get -26.7 - - 48 = 21.3

-1, -.833 - -.1875 = -.6455

Ay... I must have done something else wrong?
 
(-1)^{8/3} = 1

(and this time you multiplied by five-thirds instead of divided)
 
Urgh, hopefully I won't make these simple mistakes on the test.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top