Integrating Trigonometric Functions with Evasive Substitutions

Rory9
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I am staring at an integral of the form

<br /> \int \frac{sin(at)}{(1 + bsin^{2}(at))^{1/2}} dt<br />

which I have generated for myself (in attempting to model the behaviour of a particle in an oscillating field). I can't see a sensible substitution to try, at present. I could hunt down a standard integral, perhaps, but I suspect something obvious is evading me...

Any hints? Also, any suggestions for brushing up on solving integrals of this sort? I'm a bit rusty :-)

Cheers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rory9 said:
I can't see a sensible substitution to try, at present.
It's sin that makes this complicated, isn't it? That seems the obvious place to start.
 
This might be useful: Change 1 + b*sin^2(at) into 1 + b*(1 - cos^2(at) = 1 + b - b*cos^2(at).

You could then use the substitution u = cos(at), du = -a*sin(at)dt.

Then your integral would be roughly du/(A - bu^2)^(1/2), and you might be able to find that in a table of integrals or, failing that, apply a trig substitution.

Anyway, that's the direction I would go as a start.
 
Mark44 said:
This might be useful: Change 1 + b*sin^2(at) into 1 + b*(1 - cos^2(at) = 1 + b - b*cos^2(at).

You could then use the substitution u = cos(at), du = -a*sin(at)dt.

Then your integral would be roughly du/(A - bu^2)^(1/2), and you might be able to find that in a table of integrals or, failing that, apply a trig substitution.

Anyway, that's the direction I would go as a start.

A good suggestion. Thank you. It will end up with an arc sin of a cos, I think, but perhaps that can be rewritten more elegantly...
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top