Integrating Velocity When in Unit Vector Notation

AI Thread Summary
To find the displacement of a particle given its velocity in unit vector notation, one can integrate the velocity function over the desired time interval. The example provided shows the integration of the velocity vector, resulting in a displacement vector calculated between t=1s and t=3s. It is confirmed that each component of the velocity can be treated separately during integration, allowing for the individual evaluation of each unit vector. The final displacement is obtained by summing the results of these separate integrations. This method is valid and effectively demonstrates how to handle vector integration in physics.
ThomasMagnus
Messages
138
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Say for example, a particles velocity was given by the following equation:

\vec{V}(t) = (2t2-4t3)\hat{i} - (6t +3)\hat{j} + 6\hat{k}

If I wanted to find the displacement of the particle between t=1s and t=3s, could I just integrate like this?

\int \vec{V}= (2t3/3 - t^4)\hat{i} - (3t2 +3t)\hat{j} + 6t \hat{k} evaluated between 1.00 and 3.00

= (-63i)-36j + 18k)-(2/3-1)i+(6j)-6k= -63.3i - 30j + 12k.

Is this the correct way to do this?


Homework Statement



N/A


Homework Equations



N/A
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yep, that's correct.

As for why it's correct, suppose the particle's velocity was just 6i, so the distance is only changing in the i direction so you only integrate in that direction. Then if it's velocity was 6i + 3j, the total displacement is the same as moving the i component, then traveling in the j component separately.

The total displacement is just the vector sum, hence why your integration is correct.
 
So can you just treat each unit vector separately and integrate and evaluate each individually, then combine them all to find the displacement vector?

Thanks!
 
Yes, you can.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top