How can I integrate e^-x sinx using parts?

AI Thread Summary
To integrate the function ∫ e^(-x) sin(x) dx using integration by parts, it is necessary to apply the method twice due to the infinite number of successive differentials of both e^(-x) and sin(x). After two applications, the sine function will recur, allowing for simplification by combining terms and dividing by 2. An alternative method involves using complex numbers, specifically the imaginary part of e^((-1 + i)x), which leads to a more straightforward solution. This method results in the expression -1/2 e^(-x)(sin(x) + cos(x)) + c, showcasing a connection to Laplace transformations. The discussion highlights both the traditional integration by parts approach and the efficiency of the complex variable method.
misogynisticfeminist
Messages
370
Reaction score
0
I've got a function \int e^{-x}sinx dx

From what I know, only functions which has one or more products with a finite number of successive differentials can be evaluated using integration by parts. Because for \int v duin our choice of du, we want to cut down on the number of times we have to evaluate it using integration by parts again.

Since both e^{-x} and sinx have infinite nos. of successive differentials, how do i evaluate that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to integrate by parts TWICE, after which the Sin() will recur and can be combined with the original Sin() on the same side of the equation. Divide both sides by 2 to arrive at your answer.

~~
 
Last edited:
hey, i didn't saw that, thanks alot...
 
There is a much neater way to integrate the function. Hint : What is the imaginary part of e^{(-1 + i)x} ?

EDIT : Nevermind, here's the whole solution since it's only an extra (but "cool" method). z is the constant of integration, with c being the imaginary part of the constant.

\int e^{-x}\sin x dx = Im(\int e^{(-1 + i)x} dx) = Im(\frac{1}{-1 + i}e^{(-1 + i)x} + z)

which can be further simplified to -\frac{1}{2}e^{-x}(\sin x + \cos x) + c
 
Last edited:
I would normally second the complex variable method (since it goes nicely in the theory of Laplace transformations),but the exarcise required part integration,which of course,requires in turn less mathematical knowledge...

Daniel.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top